thingymajig

7 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by thingymajig 6y ago

   It's a very hard problem. I live next to a multi-family house in a college town and the tenants move in and out so frequently that I'm not even 100% sure who lives there... and I'm 10 feet away. Hell, I could probably only ro
2. 2.▲
   by thingymajig 6y ago

   I would agree with listening to the concerns of "the other side", but thus far their concerns do not include good-faith attempts at solving problems. Largely their "concerns" seem to be that vote-by-mail will circumvent
3. 3.▲
   by thingymajig 6y ago

   I won't just imply it, I'll say it too: It's impossible to stop ALL crime while also retaining privacy. I also said in my (very short) comment that such an extreme level of power never works out in practice. So we need to acc
4. 4.▲
   by thingymajig 6y ago

   "Just doing my job"
5. 5.▲
   by thingymajig 6y ago

   If you want to completely eradicate crime one way to do it would be to completely eradicate privacy. Would you sacrifice your privacy if it could eliminate child pornography? The theory is hard to say no to, but in practice that kind of pow
6. 6.▲
   by thingymajig 6y ago

   Is there any evidence to support this?
7. 7.▲
   by thingymajig 6y ago

   We don't need to endlessly increase productivity. The US been increasing productivity faster than wages for decades and it hasn't been good for most people.
8. 8.▲
   by thingymajig 6y ago

   I already specifically avoid both companies, so go nuts.