thesmtsolver2

5 ms·

1.
by thesmtsolver2 3d ago
You are human. You claim humans intelligent. Then, why should we accept your argument?
2.
by thesmtsolver2 4d ago
How dare the billionaire math professors profit off theorem proving! The poor altruistic AI companies like OpenAI will unleash math understanding and theorems for free for humanity!
3.
by thesmtsolver2 4d ago
They have AGI but apparently can't trace if specific conversations were used in training a model.
4.
by thesmtsolver2 5d ago
You can steal lemmas, rough proof directions, conceptual ideas etc without stealing the full proof. Any of that done unattributed is plagiarism. Either OpenAI is incompetent or evil if they can't publicly prove the allegations wrong.
5.
by thesmtsolver2 5d ago
The biggest cope is buying OpenAI's "We can't prove we didn't plagiarize" Apparently, we have AGI that can solve Millennium Prize problems but can't trace simple data flows lol.
6.
by thesmtsolver2 7d ago
That’s not how either logic or justice work.
7.
by thesmtsolver2 8d ago
What? Go ask almost anyone in Asia outside Mainland China. They all consider China to be the aggressor because they are. E.g., Tibet or India.
8.
by thesmtsolver2 8d ago
Didn’t you read the memo? Only European govts or China can act in the interests of their people and companies but if the US does that it is immoral.
9.
by thesmtsolver2 13d ago
Just because a condition is new to you doesn’t imply moving the goalpost. People have been putting forward continual learning and similar conditions like autonomy since 1950s.
10.
by thesmtsolver2 15d ago
Ahem Some Interrail travellers told to cancel passports as hacked data posted online https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/apr/23/some-inte...
11.
by thesmtsolver2 17d ago
And criminals have been caught using CCTV footage for decades.
12.
by thesmtsolver2 23d ago
Doesn’t matter. Details don’t matter. Look at the top comment thread: just politics and no discussion of the tech.
13.
by thesmtsolver2 23d ago
What about Russia and Ukraine?
14.
by thesmtsolver2 25d ago
This is the kind of comment that is considered informative and acceptable?
15.
by thesmtsolver2 25d ago
The world collectively had so much trade barriers for US goods and services and still has. They just weren’t direct like tariffs.
16.
by thesmtsolver2 25d ago
The party line for why the US tariffs are bad is that the US tariffs are bad for US customers and won’t hurt the US exporting countries. Why won’t the same logic apply to Canadian tariffs?
17.
by thesmtsolver2 29d ago
So why leave out food industry which has provably caused health harm and killed people. Leaving out the modern food industry but going after social media shows that this is just politics as the food industry wets the beak and greases the pl
18.
by thesmtsolver2 29d ago
How much of that is from legal migration from developed first world countries for both countries? I know I will be downvoted for this.
19.
by thesmtsolver2 1mo ago
But much much more dangerous than the US in China still.
20.
by thesmtsolver2 1mo ago
> do, but in private. Yeah, thanks for confirming my point.
21.
by thesmtsolver2 1mo ago
False equivalence. Also funnily you left out Europe, why? For instance, you can mock Trump and question the US all day. You can’t do that in China. Even this website is banned in China.
22.
by thesmtsolver2 1mo ago
Except 1. Illegally occupying Tibet and cleansing the region 2. Occupying and cleansing several regions like Uyghur or Hong Kong 3. Wars with neighbors like India and conflicts with all neighbors except North Korea 4. indirectly
23.
by thesmtsolver2 1mo ago
Your comment implied that. Don’t have to say everything directly. You don’t need AI hallucination to connect things logically.
24.
by thesmtsolver2 1mo ago
This not understanding "understanding". > maths are internally coherent and entirely theoretical Nope. This kind of wish-washy thinking is not what we mean by understanding. https://iep.utm.edu/math-inc/
25.
by thesmtsolver2 1mo ago
Sorry, but this is only partially informed. 1. The U.S. produces a massive share of global manufactured goods, ranking second globally behind China in total value added. 2. Only low skilled jobs were shipped overseas. Lower-value consumer
26.
by thesmtsolver2 1mo ago
This is a vacuous argument. If everything is a “probabilistic input output machine” then what exactly are you claiming? You should look into mathematical definitions of probability. You will be surprised to find not all formal mathematical
27.
by thesmtsolver2 2mo ago
Banning social media for kids before banning junk food for kids when you have a childhood obesity/health crisis just shows which companies greased the hands that made the laws https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Childhoo
28.
by thesmtsolver2 2mo ago
That's for your safety and well-being citizen. Sometimes less information is more information.
29.
by thesmtsolver2 2mo ago
Usually these commenters are not from the US but get energized by US topics and misunderstand scale of things. E.g., they come from countries with a single nationalized entity for many things.
30.
by thesmtsolver2 2mo ago
Look up when American companies got banned and when TikTok and Huawei got banned. American companies have been banned decades earlier. > Also are you going to simply ignore the fact that Tesla, Apple et. al. are operating just fine in Ch

More ›