thellimist

8 ms·

1.
by thellimist 7mo ago
From use case point of view skills are unstructured. MCP is structured. You don't want stripe skill. You want stripe MCP of CLI to interact with. When stripe does an update you want to have it. I didn't go into technical details o
2.
AI Gave Birth to the 100X Engineer(twitter.com)
1 points by thellimist 7mo ago|1 comments
3.
by thellimist 7mo ago
Does anyone else similar outputs?
4.
by thellimist 7mo ago
fixed - github.com/thellimist/clihub
5.
by thellimist 7mo ago
If you read my posts before 2023, it's same style. I guess my thinking way is similar to LLMs, has clear structure. I used to have more grammar issues, that LLMs fix, but the high level outline etc. are actually how I think about it. I
6.
by thellimist 7mo ago
Rust doesn't compile different machines well. So choose Go
7.
by thellimist 7mo ago
I did - I have my almost a dozen CLIs that are custom built that I'm using. Very reliable. It still needs to do discovery (--help etc.), always gets the job done
8.
by thellimist 7mo ago
did you check the token usage comparison between cmcp and cli?
9.
by thellimist 7mo ago
This is cool! I was actually thinking if I should support daemons just to support playwright. Now I don't have a use case for it
10.
by thellimist 7mo ago
FYI the blog has direct comparison to Anthropic’s Tool Search. Regardless, most MCPs are dumping. I know Cloudflare MCP is amazing but other 1000 useful MCPs are not.
11.
by thellimist 7mo ago
Ofc it is written by ai, I have a skill for it - https://github.com/thellimist/thellimist.github.io/blob/mast... https://github.com/thellimist/thellimist.github.io/blob/mast...
12.
by thellimist 7mo ago
I actually want to combine this and CLIHub into a directory where someone can download all the official MCPs or CLIs (or MCP to CLIs) with a single command
13.
by thellimist 7mo ago
I don't prefer to use online skills where half has malware Official MCPs are trusted. Official MCPs CLIs are trusted.
14.
by thellimist 7mo ago
I was happy with playwright like MCPs that require the daemon so didn't convert them to CLIs. My use cases are almost all 3rd party integrations. Have you seen any improvements converting on MCPs that require persistency into CLI?
15.
by thellimist 7mo ago
Nice! Compared both --- TL;DR CLIHUB compiles MCP servers into portable, self-contained binaries — think of it like a compiler. Best for distribution, CI, and environments where you can't run a daemon. mcpshim is a runtime bridge — thi
16.
by thellimist 7mo ago
What do you mean?
17.
by thellimist 7mo ago
Main differences are CLIHub - written in go - zero-dependency binaries - cross-compilation built-in (works on all platforms) - supports OAuth2 w/ PKCE, S2S, Google SA, API key, basic, bearer. Can be extended further MCPorter - TS - hug
18.
by thellimist 7mo ago
Good catch. I didn't release the website yet. I'll remove the link
19.
by thellimist 7mo ago
personal experience, definitely yes. You can try it out with `gh` rather than `Github MCP`. You'll see the difference immediately (espicially more if you have many MCPs)
20.
by thellimist 7mo ago
I can give example. LLM only know `linear` tool exists. I ask "get me the comments in the last issue" Next call LLM does is `linear --help 2>&1 | grep -i -E "search|list. issue|get. issue")` then `linear list-issu
21.
by thellimist 7mo ago
It's the same from functionality perspective. The schema's are converted to CLI versions of it. It's a UI change more than anything.
22.
Making MCP cheaper via CLI(kanyilmaz.me)
324 points by thellimist 7mo ago|119 comments
23.
Coding Agents Are at Stage 5, Everything Else Is Stuck at Stage 1(kanyilmaz.me)
1 points by thellimist 7mo ago|0 comments
24.
The AI Shift Is Real – But Senior Engineers Are Slow to Adapt(kanyilmaz.me)
1 points by thellimist 1y ago|0 comments
25.
by thellimist 1y ago
For humans - more documentation is bad. Simple documentation is generally better. For AI - what type of documentation is better? Is code + RAG sufficient? Do we need more text format summaries? What is the purpose of this particular approa
26.
Why Some Companies Thrive Remotely (and Others Fail)(medium.com)
1 points by thellimist 2y ago|0 comments
27.
Git Re-Invented the Wheel(sarupbanskota.com)
6 points by thellimist 3y ago|3 comments
28.
by thellimist 5y ago
Haystack (YC W21) | Remote | Full-time | usehaystack.io Haystack helps dev teams get incredibly good at delivering software. We do that using analytics and alerts pulled straight from Github. Haystack is a fast growing early startup. From 0
29.
by thellimist 5y ago
Haystack (YC W21) | Remote | Full-time | usehaystack.io Haystack helps dev teams get incredibly good at delivering software. We do that using analytics and alerts pulled straight from Github. Haystack is a fast growing early startup. From 0
30.
by thellimist 5y ago
Haystack (YC W21) | Remote | Full-time | usehaystack.io Haystack helps dev teams get incredibly good at delivering software. We do that using analytics and alerts pulled straight from Github. Haystack is a fast growing early startup. From

More ›