thelaxiankey2

5 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by thelaxiankey2 1y ago

   The argument your link suggests is legal, not empirical. Legally speaking, there is no mandate, and acting like there is is almost surely bad for society. So I don't disagree there. And as to the existence of exceptions, that is what m
2. 2.▲
   by thelaxiankey2 1y ago

   Do notice that the comments about 'pain and suffering are mother nature's defaults' have very little to do with anything else you said, or with the discussion more broadly. I think these sorts of things are bad internet hygie
3. 3.▲
   by thelaxiankey2 1y ago

   Sick now, but till last year it was Mt woodson/tahquitz rock/the eastern sierra. When I lived in the bay it was pinnacles, obscurities in the Santa Cruz mountains, and lovers leap/Yosemite/etc
4. 4.▲
   by thelaxiankey2 1y ago

   I've not heard a compelling description of what 'facing it' looks like, and I'd like to hear your opinion on the matter
5. 5.▲
   by thelaxiankey2 1y ago

   symbolically no (in fact I believe it can be proven that it's impossible) numerically sure (ie definite integrals can be evaluated for given values)
6. 6.▲
   by thelaxiankey2 1y ago

   the only other one is cot, actually. Personally I thought they were nice to have because coming up with the integral of 1/cos on the fly is pretty brutal in a long integral
7. 7.▲
   by thelaxiankey2 2y ago

   Somehow a lot of TV seems far more subtle (or at least nuanced) to me than popular movies. The Wire or Scavengers Reign are a couple off the top of my head.