thefucnjosh

5 ms·

1.
by thefucnjosh 6y ago
Given Trumps comments about women and Giuliani getting caught with his hands down their. The statement "not able to keep his hands in his pocket" is super on point.
2.
by thefucnjosh 6y ago
As long as it does not indicate an "imminent" threat You are correct, I was to broad.
3.
by thefucnjosh 6y ago
I really appreciate how much I learned from this reply thank you.
4.
by thefucnjosh 6y ago
Michael Sherwin, the US Attorney for the District of Columbia, told the Associated Press: "All of those charges [sedition, unauthorized access, theft of federal property] are on the table... We’re not going to keep anything out of our
5.
by thefucnjosh 6y ago
Sedition, terrorism, and advocating the overthrow of the government ARE NOT PROTECTED SPEECH
6.
by thefucnjosh 6y ago
Imagine thinking this is related.
7.
by thefucnjosh 6y ago
Comparing the Junior Congresswoman to the President of the U.S. does not lend credence to your follow-up statement especially given the ridiculous & slanderous coverage she's been given. No further discussion with you is warranted.
8.
by thefucnjosh 6y ago
this
9.
by thefucnjosh 6y ago
If you seem to serious about it, you should be more worried about the FBI & Secret Service than Twitter
10.
by thefucnjosh 6y ago
Break-up doesn't stop collusion
11.
by thefucnjosh 6y ago
Soleimani
12.
by thefucnjosh 6y ago
Which is wrong, and given Twitter's stance of issuing corrections for tweets, probably should have made her a ripe target. However, that doesn't excuse Trump's use of terrorism.
13.
by thefucnjosh 6y ago
This is a very strange case. But nevertheless it can't be said if she was killed for that. And the incident was not part of any kind of protest or riot. "Ramirez said in the Fox59 interview the two groups separated because they re
14.
by thefucnjosh 6y ago
The suspects have been caught and charged. Dorn was not a Trump supporter and wasn't killed for political reasons. Debra White told the paper that her father opposed much of Drumpf's rhetoric and policies, including "the thin
15.
by thefucnjosh 6y ago
As they should be, equality under the law should include the President. And the things he said were not protected speech.
16.
by thefucnjosh 6y ago
As well as the authority of the person spreading it. The fact that we've decided the President is above libel, slander, and felony charges is a new thing. Thank god people stopped this nonsense when he started advocating terrorism. Equ
17.
by thefucnjosh 6y ago
Falsehoods that lead to this situation. People who post beheadings on Twitter should be banned. People who incite violence should be banned. Nothing was said about U.S. Presidents.
18.
by thefucnjosh 6y ago
Sedition, terrorism, and advocating the overthrow of the government ARE NOT PROTECTED SPEECH. If the government did tell Trump he was banned it wouldn't violate any liberal principles. It's not personal that's just the law. A
19.
by thefucnjosh 6y ago
Let's hope they don't.
20.
by thefucnjosh 6y ago
I don't disagree with anything you said. But terrorist violence & sedition are not protected speech. Whether they banned him for the right or wrong reason, he still needs to be banned.
21.
by thefucnjosh 6y ago
I'm not disagreeing but are we making section 230 into a sacred cow? Surely the world isn't going to just fall apart if it is repealed.
22.
by thefucnjosh 6y ago
People are so afraid of such silly things sometimes, like those people afraid of a U.S. government run twitter. Who has more freedom to express their opinions a normal person at work whose boss can fire them for any reason, or a government
23.
by thefucnjosh 6y ago
Is this a parody or do you actually have nouns like names that you can use?
24.
by thefucnjosh 6y ago
When did the Ayatollah advocate for the abolition of his own government?
25.
by thefucnjosh 6y ago
Who has died? Can you name names?
26.
by thefucnjosh 6y ago
And that grey area is admittedly harder to give context to when the medium for it is text....but since he's the president and he's been physically SAYING falsehoods that lead to this situation, he should have been banned sooner.
27.
by thefucnjosh 6y ago
Yeah their hesitation shouldn't have happened. They shouldn't have issued those weird corrections to his statements either, they would have had MORE credibility had they come down sooner by actually assigning someone to give the p
28.
by thefucnjosh 6y ago
I don't disagree. But sedition isn't protected speech. So if they didn't ban him they're opening themselves up for lawsuits. In no country on earth is it legal for anyone to publicly advocate the overthrow of their gover
29.
by thefucnjosh 6y ago
I live in Alaska....litterally every car here is sold with summer tires.
30.
by thefucnjosh 6y ago
What experiences have you had in the world that make you think things are so complicated? From what I've seen in my short time, it seems like when you get "experts" in a room you get closed-mindedness because everyone thinks

More ›