tester34

10 ms·

1.
by tester34 5y ago
Just because in "real hacking" you can just smash somebody's head with crowbar untill he gives you the password? That's fair, but just take a look at how complex latest biggest hacks are like https://googlepro
2.
by tester34 5y ago
Good/Clean code is context dependent kernel's code is terrible mess by java/c# web app standards (dependency injection, interfaces, mockability, testability, etc) Even C#'s compiler code written in C# is below architect&
3.
by tester34 5y ago
top hackers when it comes to crimes? then probably yea, but when it comes to skills? I'd say that they're not really that unknown - https://ctftime.org/
4.
by tester34 5y ago
Is WASM going to replace: Lua, JS and LLV IRM?
5.
by tester34 5y ago
I've never bought smartphone because felt no need but the only things that make me really, really strongly consider getting smartphone is some form of Maps - let it be Google or something and ability to send&receive pictures (MMS s
6.
by tester34 5y ago
>What I mean is, the lost productivity of waiting around for slack to load a channel is essentially outsourcing this cost difference via poor performance. What makes you think that Slack's loading times is due to Electron, not shitt
7.
by tester34 5y ago
>Nobody is using Blazor. Hmm, I don't think this is true. Also this is kind of different beast - WASM has some limitations that need to be overcome
8.
by tester34 5y ago
idk Google Maps performance seems to be way worse I do wonder how's the WASM performance
9.
by tester34 5y ago
Honestly nothing gives as much experience/knowledge as trying to write it yourself and then reading about how other people do it e.g VS Code blog https://code.visualstudio.com/blogs/2018/03/23/text-b
10.
by tester34 5y ago
Yes
11.
by tester34 5y ago
Did the game name start with 'T' letter?
12.
by tester34 5y ago
Monads :P
13.
by tester34 5y ago
I share this sentiment, I do find Leetcode and stuff incredibly boring Meanwhile writing your own libraries, parsers, compilers, oh boi. Additionally it gave me waaay more than LC stuff, especially when it comes to learning system modeling
14.
by tester34 5y ago
but of course 3/4 days a week those 12-13h? I worked in system like this and I actually loved that, especially that those were night shifts I'd really take 3(+1)x 12h nights over 5x 8h
15.
by tester34 5y ago
Yea, that's what I meant What if we allowed HTTP GET Body?
16.
by tester34 5y ago
>redefine GET as having a semantic body because a bazillion different implementations (clients, servers and middle boxes) probably become non-compliant. So what actually? apps that didnt use GET Body, will not care anyway apps that will
17.
by tester34 5y ago
What is the difference between this and allowing HTTP GET with Body?
18.
by tester34 5y ago
What does algorithm (approach) has to SIMD / Hardware intrinsics?
19.
by tester34 5y ago
>which is (maxWordlength*26) long. Each segment of 26 represents a >^We're going to assume normalized words, which are all lower case and no punctuation, comprised of English letters from the 26 character alphabet. Getting the se
20.
by tester34 5y ago
>The site is basically a game if you're optimizing for points, and it's better designed than reddit because you have to actually know things to get them. Haha. Actually HN seems to be least technical community (when it comes to
21.
by tester34 5y ago
>The busses no longer accept cash in my city, you need to buy a prepaid card from a transit hub or from one of their partner retailers. So I need to get a ride to the store to get a bus pass?!? Damn, I hate this too
22.
by tester34 5y ago
>Captchas, Two-factor SMS, password rules What would replace those? Abusive/Maniac users are the problem too
23.
by tester34 5y ago
Yea, I meant Nuget iirc there were some changes around .NET Framework -> .NET Core to how does it work (where packages are stored) and that's why I said that since .NET Core I didn't have problems with it
24.
by tester34 5y ago
I had opportunity to use Roslyn's SDK APIs to build some tools that operated on full source code or uncompilable code parts and it really feels as if that was written with tooling in mind, really impressive.
25.
by tester34 5y ago
I don't think you're talking about same thing Just because JVM or CLR are complex, then it *doesn't* mean that writting good C# / Java requires you to be proficient at CLR/JVM lvl and because of that it is hard. &gt
26.
by tester34 5y ago
>with a medicore package manager What do you mean? since .NET Core it always worked flawlessly for me >unacceptable code formatter hmm? that's preference not an argument.
27.
by tester34 5y ago
Mostly groceries, what does it mean?
28.
by tester34 5y ago
>simplicity I didn't spent a lot of hours in C++ world, but it never felt simple - N compilers, N package managers, N ways to do everything
29.
by tester34 5y ago
oh shit I've spend probably 20-40 hours with those and I must say that I like "normal" programming more
30.
by tester34 5y ago
Imma clarify: By "normal" here I meant that you don't have to be some kind of genius in order to model real world using OOP. And we have shitton of programmers that everyday model real world complexities using OOP >Wasn&#x

More ›