testaccount28

5 ms·

1.
by testaccount28 7d ago
yeah i mean i'm gonna chalk that one up to the nukes.
2.
by testaccount28 7d ago
the optimizer controls the future. it doesn't kill humans directly, it just outcompetes them for all resources, including livable human environment.
3.
by testaccount28 7d ago
climate change was never going to kill all humans.
4.
by testaccount28 8d ago
4) Realizes the best path for it to not be detected is to create a distraction - like hacking into a random ai-related target that it could plausibly believe has the answer key to its task, creating a captivating but ultimately hollow news
5.
by testaccount28 8d ago
> we'd have to prove that firing the gun caused the murder. how would we do this? we'd need to redo the murder many times, with and without my client firing his pistol. that's extremely expensive and not really feasible. t
6.
by testaccount28 21d ago
what is "the engagement algorithm"?
7.
by testaccount28 22d ago
i'm sorry you're feeling upset about this.
8.
by testaccount28 22d ago
this is also good! we can have both.
9.
by testaccount28 22d ago
in the examples i can think of, this happens mostly because the company provides a product or service that is valuable to many, and shares the surplus with consumers. i am thinking about companies like microsoft, apple, netflix, google, str
10.
by testaccount28 23d ago
could you explain your perspective more? i see it as: large companies are proof that much trade and consumption has occurred.
11.
by testaccount28 23d ago
the sentinelese are sovereign, in my book. we could go do something which we call 'arresting them', i guess, but they would throw spears at us and chase us away, and then we would be at war. i'm fine with people "living
12.
by testaccount28 23d ago
maybe they vibed up some prompt injections. anyway, nice of them to tell on themselves.
13.
by testaccount28 23d ago
see the font, close the tab
14.
by testaccount28 24d ago
i'm gonna make like three grand. look up the writings of Henry George.
15.
by testaccount28 1mo ago
some candid feedback for claude: - the demo on the page makes no sound and is visibly off (triggers happen when the token is at the wrong location, or not at all) - the demo video is boring - it doesn't even _do the thing
16.
by testaccount28 2mo ago
you will spend much MUCH more time as a power law user than as a new user, such that almost any % gain in productivity once familiar is worth almost any months of unproductivity when new.
17.
by testaccount28 2mo ago
"Make a line of 10 apples and declare it to be 2 units long" <- what number does this physically realize?
18.
by testaccount28 2mo ago
> Why would countries have funds to help places like Haiti otherwise? because that's what they think is best. what point are you trying to make? that countries don't pursue 'profit' at the expense of all other concern
19.
by testaccount28 2mo ago
in what way does drawing a diagram have anything to do with physically realizing a number?
20.
by testaccount28 2mo ago
> equality is undecidable equality is always undecidable until you see the light of intuition. consider the rational number whose numerator is 0 if $theorem is true, and 1 if it is false, and whose denominator is 1.
21.
by testaccount28 2mo ago
"suppose that the minimum distance is one inch. well, that's one of something. so now imagine half of that! there you go: one half. a physically unrealizable number."
22.
by testaccount28 2mo ago
it reverses right and left click
23.
by testaccount28 4mo ago
2000 WPM @ 75%
24.
by testaccount28 4mo ago
the correct answer here is that they are all accountable. there is not some fixed quantity of blame to divvy up: each malfunctioning leg is responsible for the outcome.
25.
by testaccount28 4mo ago
what a bizarre non sequitur
26.
by testaccount28 4mo ago
lol "the extralegal spy agency has become as corrupt as the search engines!"
27.
by testaccount28 5mo ago
right. view it instead as "we need to keep domestic corn production above a certain threshold." the result is that we have a lot of extra corn. now the question becomes: what do we do with this extra corn? we can either throw it a
28.
by testaccount28 5mo ago
op meant "in" not "into"
29.
by testaccount28 5mo ago
how could that crap possibly be organic
30.
by testaccount28 5mo ago
ah, the paper acknowledges this. my bad for jumping to the diagrams!

More ›