tessierashpool

6 ms·

1.
by tessierashpool 6d ago
are you being serious? honest question. I assumed you were BSing. they literally published a manifesto. did you not know about that? I guess google them, dude. read the paper you're posting on a thread about. good luck edit : on refle
2.
by tessierashpool 6d ago
I disagree, but you could be right. however, if so, then they should have pointed out this distinction themselves. also, there was conflict between Jewish Palestinians and Muslim Palestinians long before the Holocaust. Zionists were trying
3.
by tessierashpool 6d ago
you might wonder, reading this, how a person could say "I honestly haven't heard this before" about such a widely-discussed topic, in a thread about that topic, when the OP is a paper about a very closely related topic. it is
4.
by tessierashpool 6d ago
Judaism != Israel this conflation is extremely unhelpful
5.
by tessierashpool 6d ago
I hate to say it, but this is mostly true. reason I hate to say it is because companies like Palantir and Anduril are clearly pursuing political objectives, including subverting governance by creating tools which set the frame and context t
6.
by tessierashpool 6d ago
also the new war-profiteers are profiting from a war a certain family member started this is true but it's also kind of falling into a trap. first, the weird endless hunger that man has for any and all spotlights draws attention away
7.
by tessierashpool 6d ago
take these theatrics somewhere else, please. you're changing the topic and you're not arguing in good faith.
8.
by tessierashpool 7d ago
What you said re moats might be true but can't actually be concluded from the Tailwind story. Traffic to the funnel dropped by more than half. That easily explains their problems, and says nothing about moats. Tailwind had a solid fu
9.
by tessierashpool 7d ago
I think this is reasonable but incorrect. Tailwind didn't say "our conversion rates went down." They said the traffic to their docs site went down. Their funnel depended on SEO, and LLMs took SEO out of the equation. What you
10.
by tessierashpool 11d ago
yeah, this is robot garbage. the post says: I wanted to start from scratch and learn music from first principles, and I began that journey by writing code. but we know that's not true. you began that journey in Claude Code, or Codex,
11.
by tessierashpool 22d ago
I scanned this README looking for the part written by a human and gave up when I realized there wasn't one. the Mermaid diagram doesn't even render.
12.
by tessierashpool 1mo ago
> If those were real people making those comments, there is no hope for us. they probably weren't.
13.
by tessierashpool 1mo ago
> If "free speech" was a valid defense for you, then Meta would be doing the same. Meta lobbied heavily for this. The fact that they have not decided to use free speech to fight the move that they are lobbying for is not an arg
14.
by tessierashpool 1mo ago
> In the end, the proof is in the pudding: How good is the music made with the tool? hating on OP for being AI slop is fully legit imo (sorry OP) but don't judge the concept on this example. the rotary sequencer model's actuall
15.
by tessierashpool 1mo ago
next they're going to set up thought-triggered Amazon purchases and say that moving the object from the warehouse to your home constitutes telekinesis. ever since Elon did his "promise full self-driving every year" thing, ent
16.
by tessierashpool 1mo ago
I've been tracking my Wordle stats too but only for maybe six months. I got annoyed by the Wordle Bot stats for "Skill" and "Luck" as I don't think they actually represent what they say they do. So I built a sp
17.
by tessierashpool 2mo ago
yes. and that identification would have contained the current outbreak, to some degree, or at least mitigated it.
18.
by tessierashpool 2mo ago
Claude's affected my language in two ways. one is that, for a long time, Claude in particular responded more to feedback if I swore at it, which caused me to swear at it more. this vicious cycle generalized to the point where I now hav
19.
by tessierashpool 2mo ago
no, 95% of dogs are not okay with it. 95% of the dogs in your home are okay with it. this study from Psychology Today finds that 83% of dogs freak out when they hear loud noises: https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blo
20.
by tessierashpool 3mo ago
AI's not a technology, though. LLMs are a technology. AI is a marketing term.
21.
by tessierashpool 4mo ago
this is false
22.
by tessierashpool 4mo ago
but we need to have some sort of law that creates a Chinese firewall between these mass surveillance data and the government technically we have one, the Fourth Amendment, but SCOTUS defanged it completely, years ago.
23.
by tessierashpool 1y ago
seeing a theme here https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45121617
24.
by tessierashpool 1y ago
no, they're (illegally) using a private intake system to bypass the courts.
25.
by tessierashpool 1y ago
no, they're serious, but they're not sincere. once this system is up and running, they can use it to harass and "deport" (rendition) anybody they want based on what tax-deductible contributions they've made to vario
26.
by tessierashpool 1y ago
even a swarm of satellites has risk factors. we treat space as if it were empty (it's in the name) but there's debris left over from previous missions. this stuff orbits at a very high velocity, so if an object greater than 10cm i
27.
by tessierashpool 1y ago
Since I had to google it, Metcalfe was one of the inventors of Ethernet. Fun fact, he predicted in 1995 that the internet would collapse entirely within the following year, and said he would eat his words if it didn't. In 1997, at a we
28.
by tessierashpool 1y ago
yeah, it's a good post overall, but the humblebrag factor undermines it
29.
by tessierashpool 1y ago
sorry but you’re underestimating the number of people who come here, and the range of backgrounds (and interests) they have
30.
by tessierashpool 1y ago
yeah, that’s what works for me also. LLMs are a nightmare for debugging but a breeze for this. another good use case: have it read a ton of code and summarize it. if you’re dealing with a new (to you) area in a legacy application, and tryin

More ›