tescreal

4 ms·

1.
by tescreal 7d ago
What do you mean exactly?
2.
by tescreal 7d ago
This, despite the ongoing social litigation of if this is even real? I believe AI is quite capable in the right circumstances, but I'm not convinced "this" is the watershed moment.
3.
by tescreal 7d ago
I see a lot of Self-driving cars hitting people vs. reckless drivers hitting people. What I want is simple: accountability. If a human hits a human, we throw the book at them in the case of a modality of negligence. If a robot screws up, ho
4.
by tescreal 7d ago
Correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't the popular use of the phrase relating to people who exhibited actual psychosis-like symptoms where the AI fed into a lowlevel but undeveloped delusion? Later people would appear to be experienc
5.
by tescreal 7d ago
Good to know. I use your site (with a manual transmission user-agent) often, and it's fantastic. Thanks for your work and the writeup!
6.
by tescreal 7d ago
I'm curious if anybody could speculate who would be attacking a documentation silo, and to what end?
7.
by tescreal 7d ago
>Microsoft uses Luanti for research Glad they protect Luanti's copyright & fund development.
8.
by tescreal 8d ago
Trusting vs. Intelligence (as generalities) are orthogonal.
9.
by tescreal 17d ago
It's disappointing to see the way the developers are pushing this pre-alpha quality work. I don't know (nor care) about the personalities attached, but the pitch is neat. The way it is being handled with almost daily reports of RC
10.
by tescreal 18d ago
What happened?
11.
by tescreal 19d ago
Usually I find them demanding me give them food. Shame on me for forgetting snacks!
12.
by tescreal 19d ago
What does scolding look like in crows? Sincere question.
13.
by tescreal 19d ago
I never know unless somebody thinks I was(n't) being sarcastic or glib or something. I try to be straight forward because fundamentally, I don't like the "obligation to be online" for how much I personally enjoy tech. C&
14.
by tescreal 19d ago
Did they adopt the petty naming spat over Lake Ontario^WAmerica?
15.
by tescreal 19d ago
That's easily the strangest self-destruction I've ever seen. "Skewed gender representation"? Not sure how that matters or what the intended effect of salting the earth here was.
16.
by tescreal 19d ago
I would read that as an endorsement by omission. Maybe too conspiratorial? I'll accept criticism, but it definitely smells like implication (especially given the hard right-turn ICE took in their choices of "apparel").
17.
by tescreal 19d ago
If the barrier to entry is "own a smartphone", there will inevitably be people who will be excluded. Lots of fantastic reasons to unplug in 2026, year of our plague. Even if you don't go so far, conservative allowances for da
18.
by tescreal 20d ago
I want to believe that, but I do wonder. The surveillance powers are immense for such technology. Forget the magical "SAI" stuff. It would also be a perfect cause for hyperscaling: total coverage.
19.
by tescreal 20d ago
If they're in denial, perhaps they see something bigger at play? Governments are likely very interested in the massive-scale capacities for monitoring and analysis these tools enable. The public might not even matter to the suits in th
20.
by tescreal 20d ago
Passing the buck further down the line only to enrich the well-to-do isn't exactly the meaning of "it takes a village to raise a child".
21.
by tescreal 20d ago
Sure by today's metric. I wonder if the (A)GPL could be weakened? I'm asking because I want to know the boundary line that could emerge. IANAL of course, but informed speculation welcome.
22.
by tescreal 20d ago
I expect this will result in increased lobbying for ID verification. The trick is, as i see it, to externize the cost of externalizing the cost. I think Mark is trying to create a broad coalition in broad daylight to strongarm for pushing t
23.
by tescreal 20d ago
If there's ai code, it'll be good to see if the GPL will be allowed to be enforced. I'm worried about the copyright endgame.
24.
by tescreal 21d ago
I'm curious about enforcement. Are they going to ban packages with a whiff of llm? If so, how will they reliably audit?
25.
by tescreal 21d ago
How correlated is the lack of understanding with anti-intellectual views? A lot of people aren't even curious in my experience.
26.
by tescreal 21d ago
Banning is the only surefire way to provoke interest among kids. Whatever they're denied, they will inevitably be drawn to (at least a healthy %).
27.
by tescreal 21d ago
I really want to see hard evidence of distillation before I buy into it. Seems like a lot of sour grapes over not having the sort of lead assumed. In this field, it has been shown repeatedly that leaps in performance come swiftly and withou
28.
by tescreal 22d ago
How did we get to loonie tunes levels of absurdity? I understand dragnet fishing is destructive, but who first decided that dynamite was a good fishing method?
29.
by tescreal 22d ago
it would be good to look for ".lower()" squatters if you host on an idn.
30.
by tescreal 22d ago
I expect the only plausible chance (and it is a stretch) will be at-the-censor marking. Quantum bla bla magic pixie dust or unicorn farts something. The chance of a trustworthy (including from nation-state tampering a la Stalin et al) means

More ›