teo_zero

5 ms·

1.
by teo_zero 5d ago
> I really like this website design Reading it on my phone, I beg to differ.
2.
by teo_zero 10d ago
Doesn't pressing "back" in the browser repost the same message?
3.
by teo_zero 13d ago
How do you decide who is going to pull the tokens?
4.
by teo_zero 13d ago
And how do you decide who is going to throw that one die?
5.
by teo_zero 17d ago
> this is just structs. Yes. And structs are just bytes. Levels of abstractions don't do anything the underlying levels don't already do, they just give you means to express your intent in a clearer form.
6.
by teo_zero 18d ago
But there are "cubic bazillions" of possible URLs that are being requested. Even if they boil down to "only" some millions actual commits, their rendered HTMLs are all different.
7.
by teo_zero 18d ago
Tangent question: what about NPU performance? I always read about CPU vs GPU, but nobody talks about NPUs; I don't even know if llama supports them. Why do phones and laptops get equipped with NPUs if there's no use for them?
8.
by teo_zero 19d ago
This is for iPhones only. Do I assume correctly that the issue is solved for Android, instead?
9.
by teo_zero 22d ago
> count undo as a partial game over Not at all. Contrary to other games where undos are cheating, here they are part of the game. Without them it would be 80% luck and only 20% strategy. > which is heavily implied I can't find an
10.
by teo_zero 22d ago
If your first word is four greens it's actually pretty good: you get to know four letters to avoid with just one undo!
11.
by teo_zero 28d ago
You might have misunderstood TFA. No push for trig reform, just a consideration on what internal representation is optimal in code. Imagine it like someone suggesting (understandably) that you express memory sizes in hex: no push to make ev
12.
by teo_zero 28d ago
The C standard defines the functions sinpi(), cospi(), etc. that act on half-turns. If you have a modern compiler, all you have to do is to include math.h
13.
by teo_zero 1mo ago
Sure, it's your choice where to put your precious time. Exactly like Sheldon, you prefer not to dedicate any energy to question a judgment you have decided a priori . And like him, you might be missing out on some good stuff.
14.
by teo_zero 1mo ago
While you went this road of the medical metaphor, taking antibiotics at the first suspect of sickness without checking what's really going on, is a sure way to help develop antibiotic-resistant viruses. Please note the key item is wit
15.
by teo_zero 1mo ago
Whenever I'm tempted to base my judgment on how something's been created rather than what the end result is, I think about the scene where Sheldon throws away the french toast Penny made for him, despite smelling good, just be
16.
by teo_zero 1mo ago
Even worse: cover letters, presentation letters, even CVs themselves are routinely read by AI, at least in the screening phase.
17.
by teo_zero 1mo ago
> using AI as an editor vs letting it write a whole essay for you. AI;DR is about the latter I'm sure that's the intention, but the alarming trend, at least here on HN, is crying wolf at the first em-dash.
18.
by teo_zero 1mo ago
> the difference in positions is "this could be made better" vs. "but this is already so much better than before" I would say "this could be technically better" vs. "this is already economically better
19.
by teo_zero 1mo ago
> As for 3 instructions for array access, in a simple loop a compiler can convert index access to pointer increment. In such a simple loop where you access one field in each iteration, yes. If you happen to access more fields, or the sam
20.
by teo_zero 1mo ago
I can't help wondering why so many new languages provide two separate mechanisms to define mutable and immutable variables. I see a value in defaulting to immutable unless explicitly stated, like in Rust. But having to choose between t
21.
by teo_zero 1mo ago
Sometimes yes, sometimes an equilibrium is finally reached. The fact that we see more equilibrium than extinction is purely "survivor's bias".
22.
by teo_zero 1mo ago
> An unclosed tag occurs when an opening HTML tag like <div>, <p>, or <span> is missing its corresponding closing tag. Since when does <p> requires a closing tag? Note that TFA lists this among "spec violatio
23.
by teo_zero 1mo ago
> This is worthy feedback to the author You can say the same about detecting grammatical mistakes: it's nice to warn the author, but please send them a private message, don't pollute the comments section.
24.
by teo_zero 1mo ago
The topic is the expression "itadakimasu". What the blog purports to be, belongs in the boundary. Who wrote it belongs in the boundary. Whether the syntax is correct, contains em-dashes, uses nice colors and fonts, belong in the b
25.
by teo_zero 1mo ago
Ah, now I see that indeed we agree without understanding each other. The source is a misinterpretation of your sentence far up the thread: > I can't see why the calling convention could matter. The "could matter" was under
26.
by teo_zero 1mo ago
Thank you. Sometimes I forget that for each and every significant experience in life there's probably an XKCD page that captured its essence!
27.
by teo_zero 1mo ago
If I have read the article, then reached the comments sections, it's because I have found the subject interesting. It's like watching a movie and someone trying to tell me unsolicited news about the director's private life. I
28.
by teo_zero 1mo ago
The example you set up was about f() calling into g() calling into h(). Why do you mention h() calling into g() now? The whole thread is about how the traditional calling convention makes it difficult to implement TCO in C. Functions with d
29.
by teo_zero 1mo ago
> But I think your comment "this is AI" is warranted. Clue: it's never warranted. Nobody wants to hear it. Even when it's true. Even when it's evident (actually less so when it's evident).
30.
by teo_zero 1mo ago
> There is a Japanese word that almost everyone reading this has already heard I had never heard this word. It's the second time in a row that I encounter something unknown to me that is characterized as being universal. Curiously e

More ›