tempfile

6 ms·

1.
by tempfile 5d ago
Again, lots of people put in 9 years of work and never get anywhere with it. The success tailwind has had is not a consequence of the work.
2.
by tempfile 7d ago
I really just think they got lucky, I don't see anything to celebrate. It's like celebrating one of your friends winning the lottery - good for them, but it's not really an indication the system is working well at all.
3.
by tempfile 7d ago
Unfathomably Huge Pacific Striped Octopus
4.
by tempfile 7d ago
Right, and as a consequence lots of very important software (orders of magnitude more important than tailwind) does not have full-time employees. Good for them if they can manage it, but it's a gravy train.
5.
by tempfile 7d ago
No, it doesn't. If the claim is just that download numbers are not consistently trending upwards, they should have just said that. I would have no trouble understanding that. What they actually said is "Libreoffice didn't s
6.
by tempfile 8d ago
Excuse you? What I originally said was "I don't understand your comment". They posted a clarification, and the clarification still doesn't make sense. No, I haven't read the download numbers. How is that going &qu
7.
by tempfile 8d ago
But that is perfectly consistent with the downloads incrementally going up all the time. It doesn't say anything about whether the recent policy changes increased that rate.
8.
by tempfile 8d ago
It's not clear to me that they would have credited the authors if they had not got in touch with OpenAI first.
9.
by tempfile 8d ago
I don't understand this comment. You don't seem to be disagreeing with OP?
10.
by tempfile 8d ago
I think "greyed out" just means "0 points or less", so if you get 1 downvote without any upvotes it'll be greyed out. For instance your initial reply to me is now greyed out, and I have since observed a few upvotes
11.
by tempfile 8d ago
I can imagine excuses for unknowing plagiarism in this case. What is described in the article seems much more serious: a research program that was only initiated following reports of the author's similar program . In this case no excu
12.
by tempfile 8d ago
It isn't relevant whether they were promised that. Indeed I think the assumption must be that they were not promised that, since otherwise the author asking if they were would not make much sense. If OpenAI did use the conversations
13.
by tempfile 13d ago
Ok - I don't know about the steam refunds policy. So I received a partial benefit. Perhaps I should get a partial refund? btw I wasn't being facetious, I just thought you picked the easiest part to respond to so I wondered if you
14.
by tempfile 14d ago
Shirts are consumed by use.
15.
by tempfile 14d ago
What deterministic tool will validate that a citation faithfully represents the cited claim?
16.
by tempfile 14d ago
I don't think this is an answer. I'm basically claiming there is an uncontrollable error probability, and I think you agree with that. The person I'm replying to implies it can always be reduced (maybe even to zero).
17.
by tempfile 14d ago
> you can get the bullshit machine to produce correct externally validate citations How?
18.
by tempfile 14d ago
Isn't the reason obvious? You said the jury is supposed to lack domain knowledge. Domain knowledge apparently includes knowing the possible sentence. The given example is a case where knowing the possible sentence would alter the verdi
19.
by tempfile 14d ago
BS machine produces BS; in other news water is wet and sky is blue.
20.
by tempfile 14d ago
Does it actually say anywhere that the article is handwritten?
21.
by tempfile 15d ago
>> Selling it incurs no cost on you and I have received none of the benefit of the transaction. Do you have a reply for this part?
22.
by tempfile 15d ago
The case for a refund seems totally obvious. Why should you get to keep my money? I paid for a product and I did not get it. Selling it incurs no cost on you and I have received none of the benefit of the transaction. It's not like I a
23.
by tempfile 15d ago
So they should have to return the money you paid, to account for their mistake in selling you the game.
24.
by tempfile 20d ago
So Hans can do whatever he likes because you want to blame Abdul for the cumulative sum of all his descendants?
25.
by tempfile 20d ago
What did you mean by "preserve the klimat for someone else's children" then?
26.
by tempfile 20d ago
Lazy climate change denialism, nobody is convinced.
27.
by tempfile 20d ago
> HumanProgress.org is a project of the Cato Institute You are reading propaganda.
28.
by tempfile 20d ago
> It's giving Except it isn't. Someone else could build that stupid frontend, and essentially create a better booking.com. Or you could ask the robot to make you a stupid frontend. It remains true that a well-designed MCP s
29.
by tempfile 21d ago
Evil business, glad to be rid of it.
30.
by tempfile 21d ago
"the one who wants to enact change" is not really meaningful. They want to change the working bus stop into a smashed bus stop. I want to change the people who smash bus stops into people who don't smash bus stops. I don&#x27

More ›