tediousgraffit1

4 ms·

1.
by tediousgraffit1 19d ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/My_Lai_massacre you would do well to note that this page links directly to an entire wikipedia entry for 'US War Crimes': https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unite
2.
by tediousgraffit1 23d ago
I would if I had that kind of money!
3.
by tediousgraffit1 26d ago
TIL a really good r/unixporn post is worth $8M
4.
by tediousgraffit1 1mo ago
maybe I'm missing something, I'll admit I haven't made it through the whole smug article, but critiquing knowledge work, especially IT work, just a few years after that field yielded it's...what, fourth?... major contrib
5.
by tediousgraffit1 2mo ago
I think there's some nuance here that a lot of these convos dont make plain - are we talking about just using 'ai' in the military broadly, or are we specifically talking about fully autonomous weapons systems? In the former
6.
by tediousgraffit1 4mo ago
> at a fraction of the cost of human workers. herein lies the rub
7.
by tediousgraffit1 8mo ago
> I am also dealing with a number of emergencies, including a lockdown at the Minneapolis courthouse because of protest activity, the defiance of several court orders by ICE, and the illegal detention of many detainees by ICE (including,
8.
by tediousgraffit1 9mo ago
> It used to be that a well-written document was a proof-of-work that the author thought things through (or at least spent some time thinking about it). I think you hit the nail on the head here. The problem isn't so much that peopl
9.
by tediousgraffit1 9mo ago
This is a trust issue. If someone I trust hands me a big pr, I focus on the important details. If someone i dont trust hands me a big pr, i just reject it and ask them to break the problem down further. I dont waste my time on this kind of
10.
by tediousgraffit1 9mo ago
Nowhere in here does it indicate that the generated plan was wrong or broken. I dont care if you use ai to write. I care if you write well. If the author trusted the other person, then it shouldn't matter. If the author didn't tru
11.
by tediousgraffit1 9mo ago
I guess this is more broad than like code triage and sites like that? Hard to tell cause I dont want to sign up to see what's in it.
12.
by tediousgraffit1 9mo ago
"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."
13.
by tediousgraffit1 9mo ago
I Don't Know, Timmy, Being God Is a Big Responsibility https://qntm.org/responsibilit
14.
by tediousgraffit1 9mo ago
ok but how does it work though? Is this seriously just passing the titles to some llm with a prompt like 'roast this'? is it reading the actual content of the link as well?
15.
by tediousgraffit1 10mo ago
By that logic, we should ban lettuce[1] next [1] https://www.science.org/content/article/e-coli-outbreak-trac...
16.
by tediousgraffit1 1y ago
lol, if the primary outcome is better documentation...i'll take it
17.
by tediousgraffit1 1y ago
Yeah, this is a good blog article and a great pitch for this service. There was a discussion yesterday about where to look for the next github...
18.
by tediousgraffit1 1y ago
> You’re not rejecting a bad engineer, you’re rejecting someone who doesn’t perform well while being watched. a related thing here is that I've long believed that remote work positively impacted my career for precisely this reason.
19.
by tediousgraffit1 1y ago
I'm curious how you would respond to the folks who are concerned that asking people to 'just do the work' in an interview are asking for unpaid labor, and that's unfair? (post made me lol, thanks)
20.
by tediousgraffit1 1y ago
Because we can still do things computers can't and that's interesting
21.
by tediousgraffit1 1y ago
this is the key idea right here. LLMs are not replacing good coders, they're electric yak shavers that we should all learn how to use. The value add is real, and incremental, not revolutionary.
22.
by tediousgraffit1 1y ago
I really like this, this is the perfect size project for exploring a new piece of tech. I especially like that you implemented an actual cli and not just tests.
23.
by tediousgraffit1 1y ago
This. No one, not even the very wicked, get up in the morning and think 'Im going to go make some old, bad stuff, because I'd like to decrease the amount of The Good in the world.' This article reads like the height of narcis
24.
by tediousgraffit1 1y ago
That just pushes the question off a step; a chair fit for sitting isn't fit for sleeping, etc. Fitness assumes a purpose.
25.
by tediousgraffit1 1y ago
I believe musk to be a fool and this reinforces that belief. It should not have taken him 3 years to realize that the value of Twitter was the hot and cold running stream of conversational data.
26.
by tediousgraffit1 1y ago
I love this and I'm not trying to be a downer, but I do think it's funny that 'go outside and talk to your neighbors' is an innovative idea in 20xx
27.
by tediousgraffit1 2y ago
I'm ignorant, what do they have in 3) cutting edge robotics?
28.
by tediousgraffit1 2y ago
You just want to code, I get, I'm the same way. What helps me is recognizing that in the 'corporate' environment, the challenge is not merely solving technical problems, but also coordination problems. Negative work is real,
29.
by tediousgraffit1 2y ago
Everyone's focused on the dumb 'backups' pitch and missing all the interesting engineering problems people are mentioning as objections against it.
30.
by tediousgraffit1 2y ago
> Not related to Project 2025, and they have countless times said they aren't associated with that project. lmao the chief author is the head of the OMB my guy[1] [1] https://apnews.com/article/trump-russell-voug

More ›