Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
techpeace
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
6 ms
·
1.
▲
by
techpeace
2y ago
I use it through both the chat interface and the Cursor IDE: https://www.cursor.com/
2.
▲
by
techpeace
7y ago
Just checked Huncwot out - looks like a great project, thanks! And congrats to mojombo and team! You probably already use something Tom wrote without realizing it.
3.
▲
Three Questions to Ask When Starting Your Next Bot Project
(voxable.io)
2 points
by
techpeace
10y ago
|
0 comments
4.
▲
by
techpeace
11y ago
Congrats on hitting 1.0.0! Thanks for all the hard work. The Elixir community is producing some really exciting stuff.
5.
▲
by
techpeace
11y ago
Right you are! I didn't realize it had beaten Rails to the punch by a year. But yes, I will stand by my claim that Rails was responsible for popularizing the notion in the wider web development community.
6.
▲
by
techpeace
11y ago
Could you name a major web framework that implemented the MVC pattern prior to Rails?
7.
▲
by
techpeace
11y ago
Here's a handy test to determine if two technological terms mean the same thing: are they used interchangeably? If I said to someone, "oh that looks like you need a SOAPful interface," would they assume that I meant RESTful?
8.
▲
by
techpeace
11y ago
WSDL/SOAP are not REST. I'm telling you that REST was popularized by Rails, because it was the first major web framework to use it. You've yet to refute that argument, but you do continue to be rude, so have a good one!
9.
▲
by
techpeace
11y ago
> CoffeeScript doesn't work because it requires you to learn a new language on top of JS. The folks that have been quietly productive with CoffeeScript for years, and have and continue to make millions of dollars because of it, woul
10.
▲
by
techpeace
11y ago
> It was a major factor, yes, but claiming this purely as an accomplishment of Ruby is silly. A major factor in popularizing it, as I claimed. Personally, I had never heard of it before DHH's 2006 RailsConf keynote. Could you point
11.
▲
by
techpeace
11y ago
I didn't claim that the Ruby community invented REST. Rails 1.2 (2006) was the first major web framework to implement it. Do you have any evidence to support your claim that I'm incorrect?
12.
▲
by
techpeace
11y ago
Could you point me to a major web framework that used REST before Rails 1.2 (2006)? > What the f* are you on? Or were you born a few years ago and just worked with Ruby since then? I've been using Ruby professionally for 10 years.
13.
▲
by
techpeace
11y ago
Here's a quick (incomplete) list of web innovations you can thank the Ruby community for either popularizing or inventing outright: * REST * Many parts of ES.next * Front-end build tools * CSS pre-compilation * JS transpilation I spent
14.
▲
by
techpeace
11y ago
This whole story seems like pretty poor form. You based your business, in part, on a closed-source product, failed to test your multi-platform product on... any of the other platforms you planned on releasing it for, and then wrote up a len
15.
▲
by
techpeace
11y ago
Fantastic work! Thanks for sharing it with the community. I'm excited to check this out further.
16.
▲
by
techpeace
11y ago
> That doesn't mean nobody should ever want customization. I fail to see where I made that claim. IDE's are also customizable - I would argue that they are, in fact, much more customizable than either vim or emacs, simply becau
17.
▲
by
techpeace
11y ago
> Great programmers use vim or emacs These kind of generalizations aren't helpful, simply because they aren't true. Are vi and emacs still going to be in wide use 500 years from now? Likely not. Then it stands to reason that th
18.
▲
by
techpeace
11y ago
Saying that you "don't understand" allegations of sexism at Amazon, as a white man, is going to be tough for folks to accept. You've likely never experienced the sexism. As a fellow white man, I've never really deal
19.
▲
by
techpeace
11y ago
+1 Also worth checking out: https://www.filamentgroup.com/lab/font-events.html
20.
▲
by
techpeace
11y ago
Haha, hey man! No, it's not really possible to decouple Marionette from Backbone, I just don't like typing "Backbone Marionette" every time, so I just use "Marionette." But for the uninitiated, Marionette is in
21.
▲
by
techpeace
11y ago
I use Marionette: http://marionettejs.com/ 1. You can grasp the basics in just a few hours, but obviously this is entirely subjective. A week-long training course will really get you going, though. The nice thing in terms o
22.
▲
by
techpeace
11y ago
Yeah, this is one of those "feature not a bug" things that's been known for some time. As others have pointed out, sign your commits if this bothers you. It's even possible to get your fellow open source contributors to
23.
▲
by
techpeace
11y ago
Excellent work, thanks for sharing!
24.
▲
by
techpeace
11y ago
Except for the LIBOR scandal, of course. And the ISDAfix mess. But those only involved most of the world's largest banks, and combined, likely only affected anybody seeking credit, anywhere, for any reason.
25.
▲
by
techpeace
11y ago
I once worked for a startup in the education industry. One day, when Blackboard released a new product that directly competed with us, we noticed that their new logo was an obvious, clearly intentional rip-off of our own. It was actually gr
26.
▲
by
techpeace
11y ago
GitHub repo: https://github.com/jeyoder/ThingsInSpace
27.
▲
by
techpeace
11y ago
Well, as the history of this country has been one of expanding the scope of rights to encompass more people, rather than one of limiting rights to only apply to folks that think and act like the majority, I'm for it. The only time we t
28.
▲
by
techpeace
11y ago
Location: Austin, TX Remote: Sure! Willing to relocate: No, sorry Technologies: Marionette.js/Backbone.js (3 years), Ruby/Rails (10 years) Résumé/CV: https://www.linkedin.com/in/mattbuck Email: me@matthe
29.
▲
by
techpeace
11y ago
> "but that's a pretty resolved question at this point, and would require overruling about 200 years of precedent on the issue " So, I assume you're leaving Loving v. Virginia out of that figure? [1] [1]: https:/
30.
▲
by
techpeace
11y ago
As a lawyer, could you explain how denying over 1,000 federal marriage benefits to same-sex couples would be offering them equal protection under the law?
More ›