tech-ninja

7 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by tech-ninja 2mo ago

   I agree with you and I didn't think your comment was rude. Some people are against using LLMs and they will always find an excuse instead of experimenting with them so it doesn't matter how helpful you try to be they already made
2. 2.▲
   by tech-ninja 9mo ago

   > In _most_ cases that means delivering code that you should be able to confidently prove satisfies the requirements like the OP mentioned That is an insane distinction that you are trying to do there. In which cases delivering code that
3. 3.▲
   by tech-ninja 9mo ago

   I disagree, no company no matter the size will have E2E or integrations tests for all of its features, it's just not feasible. Unless you are working on a tiny change on a highly tested part of the code you should be manually testing y
4. 4.▲
   by tech-ninja 9mo ago

   Agreed, I'm also on a $200/year plan and for me too the fact that I can skim multiple books on a single topic before settling on one is well worth the money.
5. 5.▲
   by tech-ninja 9mo ago

   I also pay $200/year, well worth the cost for me.
6. 6.▲
   by tech-ninja 11mo ago

   I've had good experiences with Wise but jesus this is a nightmare, it looks like their customer service is crooked. It's a shame that such a great company can be so inflexible and let this type of situations fly.