teamhappy

6 ms·

1.
by teamhappy 8y ago
Also this list of countries by income equality: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_income_eq...
2.
by teamhappy 8y ago
> I'm glad to see as much development in the space as possible. I'm sure you are aware of Nitrokey. If not, here you go: https://www.nitrokey.com/
3.
by teamhappy 8y ago
It says "Continue to MapTiler Cloud" in the bottom right corner. https://www.maptiler.com/cloud/ Looks like it's an online map editor/map viewer that supports both vector an raster images.
4.
by teamhappy 8y ago
You might like Nitrokey: https://www.nitrokey.com/
5.
by teamhappy 8y ago
The method used to calculate the fines is the same for every company. You can review it here: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CEL... Seems perfectly reasonable to me.
6.
by teamhappy 8y ago
They've fined plenty of EU-based companies as well. https://www.cnbc.com/2017/06/27/the-largest-fines-dished-out...
7.
by teamhappy 8y ago
Here's the algorithm used to set the fines: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CEL...
8.
by teamhappy 8y ago
Nitrokey is open source (hardware and software). They claim the "installed firmware can be exported and verified, preventing attackers from inserting backdoors into products during shipping". ( https://www.nitrokey.com&#
9.
by teamhappy 8y ago
Here's a very detailed comparison: https://github.com/AppImage/AppImageKit/wiki/Similar-project...
10.
by teamhappy 8y ago
Same press release but in PDF form: http://europa.eu/newsroom/rapid-failover/ip-18-4581_en.pdf
11.
by teamhappy 8y ago
He has videos on his Instagram that show him starting from scratch, live painting President Macron (no idea when that happened) and more.
12.
by teamhappy 8y ago
Glenfarclas and Glendronach are are both great alternatives to Macallan. Glendronach is a bit too sweet for my taste though and since Glenfarclas is much more affordable (at least here in Germany) I always recommend that one first.
13.
by teamhappy 8y ago
Laphroaig, Ardbeg or maybe the distillers editions from Lagavulin and Talisker. Islay is pretty small so you don't really have that many options. Since you like Macallan (I assume sherry oak?) you might like one of the older Glenfarcla
14.
by teamhappy 8y ago
IIRC Mercedes wasn't caught cheating they just got in trouble because they use the same engine control units which contain the routines that make cheating possible.
15.
by teamhappy 8y ago
> You only need to put an email address on your personal websites. You don't have to publish any contact information on non-commercial websites.
16.
by teamhappy 8y ago
Lobyplag publishes the documents different companies/govs hand out: https://lobbyplag.eu/docs
17.
by teamhappy 8y ago
I don't get it. How is giving more rights to researchers restricting startups?
18.
by teamhappy 8y ago
They're copyright exceptions , not restrictions, meaning you don't need a license to process copyrighted data for scientific research.
19.
by teamhappy 8y ago
The website in question is this one: https://augsburgfuerkrawalltouristen.noblogs.org/ Apparently the authors use a Riseup email account.
20.
by teamhappy 8y ago
> The website called for violence. That's actually true. I don't know why both the CCC and Riseup feel the need to exclude that the website explicitly asked for violent protests. It doesn't change the fact that the raids w
21.
by teamhappy 8y ago
What else do you think it applies to? The latest version of the law that I've seen says: "(4b) ‘online content sharing service provider’ means a provider of an information society service one of the main purposes of which is to st
22.
by teamhappy 8y ago
What am I wrong about?
23.
by teamhappy 8y ago
> This law has definitely added at least friction to competing startups, and a barrier to entry at worst. That's a bit of an understatement especially if you consider how bad the law looks from a PR standpoint, how unlikely it is to
24.
by teamhappy 8y ago
> otherwise they're liable for all copyright infringement of any linked page? No, of course not. Like I said above, the "link tax" part (article 11) has nothing to do with linking. But even if it would, it still wouldn&#x2
25.
by teamhappy 8y ago
> how will anyone ever be able to oppose them? The law clearly states that the size of the company and the costs of the "measures" should be taken into account, so that shouldn't be an issue. > if you make any mistake,
26.
by teamhappy 8y ago
> Any website with a comments section (hey, this one included) would need to extensively monitor all posts That's not true. The law only applies to "content sharing service providers" (sites like YouTube, SoundCloud, Insta
27.
Firefox Developer Tools: Accessibility inspector(developer.mozilla.org)
441 points by teamhappy 8y ago|55 comments
28.
by teamhappy 8y ago
Article 11 is the "link tax" one and article 13 is the upload filter one. You seem to think that both articles are somehow connected. Article 13 only applies to sites that are upload services like YouTube and SoundCloud for exampl
29.
by teamhappy 8y ago
The proposal says "The rights referred to in the first subparagraph shall not apply in respect of uses of insubstantial parts of a press publication". The title is the least substantial part I can think of.
30.
by teamhappy 8y ago
> That's what is being proposed No it isn't. Just read the damn thing. http://www.consilium.europa.eu/media/35373/st09134-en18.pdf

More ›