tbh2347

6 ms·

1.
by tbh2347 15y ago
Not to be that guy, but technically (0.999) = 1 - 10^(-inf).
2.
by tbh2347 15y ago
Well the way I see it is it's something that would be nice but in no way should be demanded from a service like Google+.
3.
by tbh2347 15y ago
I hope you realize that you can fine tune every bit of your profile to hide sensitive information (and show it to the right circles). The stalker would only be able to see that [someone] has a Google+ profile...
4.
by tbh2347 15y ago
Nice to see some objective reporting here - goes ahead to call Paul Allen "clearly a Google+ fanboy" and tries to relate 750 million to 1 billion. "[I]s it as big a deal as people are making it out to be? Yes, Google+ might end up being the
5.
by tbh2347 15y ago
On the other hand, I don't understand why someone would alienate users of certain countries unless they had a reason to do so . I like to give companies benefit of the doubt when there's no hint of a conspiratorial political agenda.
6.
by tbh2347 15y ago
Dead for me too =/
7.
by tbh2347 15y ago
Unless we're talking about different things (I'm thinking http://jqueryui.com/themeroller/ ), it feels completely different from jQueryUI. jQueryUI is much glossier and not as muted.
8.
by tbh2347 15y ago
Linkbait, Zuckerberg has only opted to hide certain stats on his profile and he now no longer shows up in this top followed lists. It has been noted that Google execs have similarly done so.
9.
by tbh2347 15y ago
At the risk of introducing another level, I will mention that these comments are very Meta :)
10.
by tbh2347 15y ago
Really cool how people are using hangouts to let others "drop by and say hi." Office hours, pg?
11.
by tbh2347 15y ago
There's no control just like there's nothing stopping people from recording your conversation in real life and passing it around the office. Sure, on the Internet things are easier, but it's the same concept that you can make it socially di
12.
by tbh2347 15y ago
People have to stop saying this. Google isn't so blind as to think every product's sole purpose is to drive pageviews. I'm speculating just as much as you are, but I don't think it's unreasonable to guess that a big part of Google+ is to dr
13.
by tbh2347 15y ago
+ chrome canary build!
14.
by tbh2347 15y ago
It's not about the technical restrictions, the edge cases. It's about what a user expects when posting, the overall experience when sharing. There will be the occasional embarrassing reshare, but for the most part users will (in theory...)
15.
by tbh2347 15y ago
I hope the OP is reading this - I highly doubt Google is mistrusting its teenager population, you might be reading into this more than you should. The invalid invites that got sent out - more than just the teenage crowd were offended. Let's