Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
tassl
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
9 ms
·
1.
▲
by
tassl
6y ago
Wait, why would having a non-Apple store being allowed in iOS affect you? If people want to install non-Apple approved apps from their own devices, it doesn't imply you have to do the same.
2.
▲
by
tassl
6y ago
Actually, engineers in big companies have more control than it seems. After all, privacy is not only about intent, but also execution, and care needs to be taken at every level. Privacy requires engagement from all levels, and I'm this
3.
▲
by
tassl
6y ago
> we can do our best to get as many as possible unnecessary deaths to end. What if the best way to decrease (unnecessary) deaths is to consume animals?
4.
▲
by
tassl
6y ago
> (...) while crop deaths may happen, it is not a requirement that it does. Wait, so just because you consider that it is not a requirement, it is ok? The reality is another and veganism could be ending the world and you would be defendi
5.
▲
by
tassl
6y ago
> The peer-reviewed science we have suggests that higher soy consumption correlates with increased lifespan and positive health outcomes. Couple of things here: (1) Correlation is not causation (2) Garbage in, garbage out -> referring
6.
▲
by
tassl
6y ago
Let me doubt that assessment. That would be true if (1) the 50-to-1 was true (doubt it); (2) what we feed the cattle is human-grade food and (3) 1 calorie of a plant was as nutritious as 1 calorie of meat.
7.
▲
by
tassl
6y ago
Not because of deforestation, but because threats to orangutans. Most of the food animals eat is not human-grade, and a big part of it are by products of food for human consumption it would not be used anyways.
8.
▲
by
tassl
6y ago
No, even if most of livestock feed was soy (I am pretty sure it was corn, but whatever), most of the food they are feed as dry matter is not edible by humans: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/
9.
▲
by
tassl
6y ago
It does not make any sense, no matter how you look at it. Sure, you can see those "articles", but don't forget that those are going to be based on IQ tests, and those are correlated with intelligence and... wait for it... edu
10.
▲
by
tassl
6y ago
> Livestock agriculture is the leading driver of climate change AND biodiversity loss. I am pretty sure that's not correct, not even close [1]. Transportation is the main driver of gas emissions (28%) followed by electricity product
11.
▲
by
tassl
6y ago
It is not as simple as you think, and there is quite a bit of people cannot be healthy with such diet. > Many are also passionate about it because there are other benefits that come with it - no longer needing to kill sentient beings (yo
12.
▲
by
tassl
6y ago
I am pretty sure Amazon deforestation affects the rest of the world too. While I don't completely agree with the need of deforestation of the country, I upvoted you because I agree with the rest of the message. Specially, I agree other
13.
▲
by
tassl
6y ago
Most of the benefits you mention come from weight loss, and almost any intervention that can cut weight during the first years would report similar improvements. Plenty of people lose weight, drop blood sugar and drop blood pressure by goin
14.
▲
by
tassl
6y ago
As unethical as eating soy from a deforested area. Or eating mostly anything with sugar, canola oil or palm oil. But people don't ask those to be in non deforested areas, and they don't ask to increase the price to make sure soil
15.
▲
by
tassl
6y ago
> How much could this reduce the total environmental food print of cattle? I.e. including all the energy used to grow the crops they eat, the deforestation to make room for the crops + cattle, the waste the cows produce. Quite a bit. Mos
16.
▲
by
tassl
6y ago
>t might work if intelligence wasn't important for members of lower castes but was for higher castes, perhaps due to the nature of their culture or work. Then low castes wouldn't select for intelligence but high castes would. N
17.
▲
by
tassl
6y ago
And we know how that has worked in royal families across Europe. In any case, your analogy was not this one in the first post, unless you are saying that higher caste meant higher IQ from the beginning.
18.
▲
by
tassl
6y ago
That's a false analogy. Genetics can beat training but discrimination cannot be overcome without intervention. I'm a strong believer in equality of opportunities, but I feel that's constantly misunderstood. If your family can
19.
▲
by
tassl
6y ago
The Onyx Boox 3 max is great for that. the main function I use (articles and books) is the split screen with notes in one side and book/article in the other. The main downside is the price (~$800). It is also bulkier than other options
20.
▲
by
tassl
6y ago
I have worked at a few orgs and I've heard so many time the "because we are Google" to explain why a product will be used. I've never understood that mentality; I've never understood people being proud basically abo
21.
▲
by
tassl
7y ago
This is completely misleading. Even if his first company was the first self driving vehicle project ever (which was not) or the only piece in the puzzle (which it wasn't either), there were other cofounders of that startup. This is glo
22.
▲
by
tassl
7y ago
I guess this is going to be controversial, but shoes are not preventing running injuries because most people ran farther and with worst technique than they should. Farther because running injuries increase with the distance run, specially w
23.
▲
by
tassl
7y ago
And if you run a 400m once, you will have PTSD when you are on the blocks getting ready to run the next.
24.
▲
by
tassl
7y ago
I'm not the OP, but I mostly agree with his comments. I have trained track and field for years, and bad running technique is highly correlated with injuries. I don't understand this mentality of running longer and longer distances
25.
▲
by
tassl
7y ago
Most would vote Yes to independence. Most would rather have a different relationship with Spain and yes, a big chunk of people would have liked to remain in Spain with increased autonomy. Since this seems impossible and the direction Spain
26.
▲
by
tassl
7y ago
> The population in Catalonia is 7,5 millions, and the people that voted independentist parties are 1,6 millions. Have you consider the possibility than not all those "inexistent" people are independentists?. 7.5 million includ
27.
▲
by
tassl
7y ago
> The infrastructure of catalunya (high speed trains, ports, highways, etc...) have been paid by all spaniards during many, many years. Like ways, may people from all over Spain live and work in catalunya and viceversa. That is not true.
28.
▲
by
tassl
7y ago
Ugh. > Trust me, in this case will be war Sorry, after reading your text the one thing I can't do is to trust you. > At difference than Norway, there is a silent majority in Catalonia that is fuming. I would love to see data on t
29.
▲
by
tassl
7y ago
> Because we know it's not the cleverest idea in the world and therefore we don't want to play that game. This awfully sounds like: "We know better" "Hey Catalans, you guys don't really know what's good
30.
▲
by
tassl
7y ago
> Anyway, they level of independence that Catalonia has had in the last decades is much higher that before that “annexion”. I am sorry to say, but this is the misleading part. You can't compare the situation hundreds of years ago wi
More ›