tarxzvf

7 ms·

1.
by tarxzvf 9d ago
Models hallucinate plausible answers to why they did things. It might be true and it might be complete fiction.
2.
Ironies of Automation (1983) [pdf](ckrybus.com)
3 points by tarxzvf 1mo ago|0 comments
3.
by tarxzvf 2mo ago
Thousands of words and piles of equations and not a single mistake pointed out? I have zero domain knowledge here, but enough interactions with AI agents to think this is wildly crazy.
4.
The Bloat(milkandcigarettes.com)
1 points by tarxzvf 4mo ago|0 comments
5.
Why Haven’t More Quantum Algorithms Been Found? (2003) [pdf](cs.brynmawr.edu)
3 points by tarxzvf 4y ago|0 comments
6.
Gödel Machines: Self-Referential Universal Problem Solvers (2006)(arxiv.org)
2 points by tarxzvf 4y ago|1 comments
7.
The Limits of Automation(milkandcigarettes.com)
1 points by tarxzvf 4y ago|0 comments
8.
Refactoring as Anxiety Relief(milkandcigarettes.com)
2 points by tarxzvf 4y ago|0 comments
9.
The Limits of Automation(milkandcigarettes.com)
1 points by tarxzvf 4y ago|0 comments
10.
Maximum Flow and Minimum-Cost Flow in Almost-Linear Time(arxiv.org)
230 points by tarxzvf 4y ago|40 comments
11.
by tarxzvf 4y ago
This is impressive. Yet, before you go the AGI is nigh, ask yourself a simple question: will this spiral in or spiral out? If we feed everything the model comes up with back as training data, will we get Endless Forms Most Beautiful or will
12.
by tarxzvf 4y ago
Yes. The only force we know that achieves this is undirected, and no single part of it stays at the top for long. Contrast with superintelligence, a single entity which does not evolve but optimizes in a directed way.
13.
by tarxzvf 4y ago
Honestly astonished that superintelligence is a mainstream idea. The story it tells makes sense only if you never bothered to dig further than its surface. - Replace 'AI' with 'God', does it still make sense? - Exponents
14.
by tarxzvf 5y ago
Just replace K and JavaScript with German and English to see the vacuity of this argument. Either of several possible representations can become native to one’s thinking. The question is which is a better aid in reaching some non-arbitrary
15.
by tarxzvf 5y ago
Everything is pattern matching (or memorization). You can use this approach to half-automate the solution to a known existing class of problems, but how do you come up with anything new? How did Paul Cohen came up with the forcing technique
16.
by tarxzvf 5y ago
Feels like a take from an alternate reality. I can’t think of a single great developer I know who was not self-taught. In my experience, if you got the will, drive, attitude, and curiosity, you had it for a while, and any given situation ca
17.
by tarxzvf 5y ago
What exactly are the right priors for general intelligence? And keep in mind, whichever prior you choose, I can design learning problem where it will lead you astray. This paper provides some interesting results on the weakness inherent in
18.
by tarxzvf 5y ago
The problem goes much deeper than these adversarial examples. The main issue is Solomonoff Uncomputability (or the No Free Lunch in Search and Optimization theorem, or any of the other hard limiting theorems). In short, it’s not only that y