ta75757

6 ms·

1.
by ta75757 12y ago
Read or understand? This is legalese we're talking about.
2.
by ta75757 12y ago
And mentioning any of this is described as a "personal attack". javert's post was based on his personal experience with his aunt. You said it was made up nonsense. This is essentially calling him a liar, whic
3.
by ta75757 12y ago
Can I ask what you think happened to all those people who stopped getting Welfare after it was "reformed" in 1996? Did they all pull themselves up by their bootstraps and march off to Walmart to get minimum wage jobs?
4.
by ta75757 12y ago
the Left had the House, Senate, and President and could have passed anything they wanted for two years You're forgetting about the filibuster. And the Democrats only had a filibuster proof Senate for less than half of o
5.
by ta75757 12y ago
The alt text of that XKCD is: Now, if it selectively kills cancer cells in a petri dish, you can be sure it's at least a great breakthrough for everyone suffering from petri dish cancer. so it's still relevant.
6.
by ta75757 12y ago
The French and Indian War wasn't the French fighting against the Indians. It was the Americans and British fighting against the French and the Indians.
7.
by ta75757 12y ago
I don't think he was presenting his past actions as good. He was showing that he himself has made the same mistake.
8.
by ta75757 12y ago
This is your interpretation. Mine, and pretty much everyone else's on the thread. If everyone interprets what you say a particular way, maybe that's what it appears to mean? And if that's not what you meant, maybe
9.
by ta75757 12y ago
It is theoretically possible to avoid that via cryptography but I doubt the cell phone protocols include that.
10.
by ta75757 12y ago
I wrote a bunch of crap below, but the point is this: do you think an average non scientific reader would come to the conclusion that the device extracts energy from salt water? If the answer is yes, then the site is misleading, because it
11.
by ta75757 12y ago
Could one use some form of cell tower white-list as a countermeasure to stingray? Or is it a purely passive attack?
12.
by ta75757 12y ago
The complaint isn't that they "didn't explain properly". The complaint is that they sensationalized an inaccurate explanation, without addressing the fundamental technological question: is this better than existing bat
13.
by ta75757 12y ago
Salt water is free. Salt water is not the point . The anodes and cathodes and the LED lamp are the point. corner store to go pick up batteries at The electrodes need to be replaced regularly. Where will the replacement
14.
by ta75757 12y ago
While I would not have used the harsh words, grandparent is right in most respects. I challenge you to quote the 'misleading' sections verbatim Voila: Sustainable and cost effective ecologically designed lamp po
15.
by ta75757 12y ago
Electricity from water and salt? Why don't they just use cold fusion?
16.
by ta75757 12y ago
I disagree, it causes laymen to completely misunderstand the product. The product is not "energy from water and salt". The product is a fixed quantity of chemical energy sold in the form of the metal anodes/cathodes. This
17.
by ta75757 12y ago
I'm pretty sure he has said that he does not want his work continued in the event of his death. http://www.tor.com/blogs/2013/11/george-rr-martin-no-more-ga...
18.
by ta75757 12y ago
Can someone explain why you can't just use the IP address to track it down? I mean some ISP somewhere must control it, and they must know what physical link it's bound to, etc...
19.
by ta75757 12y ago
illegal immigration is... well... illegal and legal immigration has vaccination requirements
20.
by ta75757 12y ago
I'd believe that, I didn't do a thorough search. But the document that claims to describe Mass DOR collections doesn't cover it.
21.
by ta75757 12y ago
That's what civil asset forfeiture is for. That's drug money you got there you see. (Never mind that if word gets out you will get robbed.)
22.
by ta75757 12y ago
The government will take what it wants. If you have a house, they will take it. If you have a car, they will take it. Bits on a hard drive don't help if you can't hold property. They even got the Swiss banks to cough up Americ
23.
by ta75757 12y ago
OP claims "they have not sued me or sent me any sort of court order" Edit: According to [0] they don't need to. They just send you a notice and if you don't respond in time they take what they want. It's not clear
24.
by ta75757 12y ago
I don't get why you're being downvoted to oblivion. You were perfectly polite. So people disagree with you about the definition of martial art . So what?
25.
by ta75757 12y ago
It's not more valuable, it's just possible, unlike most (all?) of the things you listed. (Not trying to be a jerk, those things are just virtually impossible with today's technology.)
26.
by ta75757 12y ago
I'm guessing the phrase the other poster was objecting to is "I guess it's hard for you to understand...".
27.
by ta75757 12y ago
rytis brought up slaughterhouses. talmand replied about hunting. the use of the word "game" in hunting is a coincidence.
28.
by ta75757 12y ago
he's talking about hunting. in real life. game is the word for animals that are hunted.
29.
by ta75757 12y ago
I suspect most elites hold little of their portfolio in cash. Sure, if the government taxes/borrows/prints to invest in things that help the economy that can have a positive net effect. I don't think hunting for neutrinos is
30.
by ta75757 12y ago
As (failed) physics major, it sounds so strange to hear someone claim to be good at math but not physics. To me physics is 98% math. It's a few empirical facts from experiments and then bucketloads of math.

More ›