ta38383

5 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by ta38383 13y ago

   The sane thing to do would be to phase it out. And replace it with what? You can't phase something out until you have a replacement. (Or you could send everyone back to a 19th century standard of living.)
2. 2.▲
   by ta38383 13y ago

   touche ... Although it's hard to read the following as not calling a figurative-me hostile, for my choice of pronoun. Q: They said I was being hostile! A: I'm sorry, but you were.
3. 3.▲
   by ta38383 13y ago

   The point of the article, is that it does exist. It is spelled "they". I happen to agree with (this part) of the article.
4. 4.▲
   by ta38383 13y ago

   "perceived hostility" is not "hostility" The article had me until it basically said using "he" in documentation makes you an asshole. It does not. Period. You can say it's better to use they, and I woul
5. 5.▲
   by ta38383 13y ago

   Tea. Decaf/herbal as desired.
6. 6.▲
   by ta38383 13y ago

   Not entirely,for music in the US there is compulsory licensing in the law. The orignal copyright owner does not need to agree as long as the covering musician complies with the terms of the compulsory license laws. http://en.wik
7. 7.▲
   by ta38383 13y ago

   Except of course when it's true. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Overfishing#Instances