ta3216

6 ms·

1.
by ta3216 8y ago
My site is focused on shopping and dining out therefore I don’t think the conclusions in those papers apply in my case. The audio interruptions noted in the Pandora test are far more intrusive than in-page display ads. If I used interstitia
2.
by ta3216 8y ago
Firstly my readers would have no idea what Adsense even is. But if they see accompanying ads like Swarovski, Nordstrom, local restaurant, then yes, I believe it would positively impact their impression on an intuitive level. If they activel
3.
by ta3216 8y ago
I think it depends on the audience. Looking at your blog I can see how ads may not work as well. My blog is focused more on dining out, shopping etc where viewers think nothing of ads and I think they would even think it weird if there were
4.
by ta3216 8y ago
I thought I read somewhere that ads make a blog seem more authoritative so I disagree about not having ads.
5.
by ta3216 8y ago
I just exported my subscriber list for safe keeping. If I could automate this as a monthly job that would be even better.
6.
by ta3216 8y ago
I completely agree. I’m the copyright holder of text I published on my own website years ago; the fact they hold on to my written copyrighted work without my permission, ignoring my explicit request to remove it from their internal database
7.
by ta3216 8y ago
That does suck. Ideally you should have waited a few years after you quit before initiating the divorce.
8.
by ta3216 8y ago
Well, now kids would be learning about overclocking video cards, messing with refresh rates, optimizing their gaming mouse etc. Same idea. I had Zork and PAC man growing up and while I enjoyed it I wasn’t completely addicted to it possibly
9.
by ta3216 8y ago
And what if he had Fortnite etc back then? Would he have really excelled at computer work? Maybe.
10.
by ta3216 8y ago
I was only asking about alimony, not asset division. It’s become clear in his situation that he previously had a high paying job, quit or switched to a lesser paying job right before the divorce, and expected the alimony to be reflected bas
11.
by ta3216 8y ago
I assume he had significant income in previous years, switched jobs for whatever reason, makes significantly less, but alimony is based on past few years income. That must hurt but I think is done to protect the other person since some peop
12.
by ta3216 8y ago
I don’t get it. Assuming she didn’t work, wouldn’t it be half your income averaged over the past few years? Meaning, regardless of what she thinks she deserves, isn’t there a standard calculation used, ie half?
13.
by ta3216 8y ago
I think it’s important to take a more active stand. My child joined a school sport this fall and the coach told us information will be provided on a private Facebook group. I told him I don’t use Facebook and demanded he also put the inform
14.
by ta3216 8y ago
Aren’t the full res images copyright violations?
15.
by ta3216 8y ago
If a tree falls in the forest and nobody is there to hear it, does it make a noise? If IA is storing copyrighted (noarchive) content but not displaying it, does that make it acceptable?