sznio

6 ms·

1.
by sznio 7d ago
> more feature announcements to our internal staff than they can handle have you considered the consequences of that or are you still drunk and thinking that this is a good thing?
2.
by sznio 7d ago
I quit my job recently. I was forced to go to an office, to sit in a room alone to work remotely with a team on the other side of the country. Our manager was pushing for Claude Code, so we needed to use it a lot, our metrics were tracked.
3.
by sznio 8d ago
just barely over a 100M more
4.
GPT-6 Astra creating GTA San Andreas mods, editing the map and 3D models(youtube.com)
5 points by sznio 8d ago|2 comments
5.
by sznio 8d ago
I struggled to give this a less clickbaity name. Original: "AGI has been achieved in GTA San Andreas" From author's comment: - Each demo was 3 prompts max - Prompts were intentionally short and simple - Model used : Astra 6 w
6.
by sznio 8d ago
it proved navier-stokes taking over the us government is easier imo, any idiot gets to be president
7.
by sznio 9d ago
> there is, however, kind of a lot of history showing nothing will happen to him or meta. Well, the silver lining is that the world is probably going to be fine in the end. If the governments don't actually get a grip and regain con
8.
by sznio 9d ago
> Existing investors a16z I don't trust anything the antichrist invests in
9.
by sznio 9d ago
> humanoid robots are decades away I think the world has gone too crazy to make any such claim. They could be decades away, they could be a year away. Remember that it doesn't have to be necessarily better than a human, it just need
10.
by sznio 9d ago
wondering when AMD will realize it can charge 2x as much for the same thing, by simply finally writing a fucking driver
11.
by sznio 9d ago
I think everyone is infected by doomerism. Why care about the long term consequences if the world is going to be over in the next 20 years.
12.
by sznio 9d ago
I have moved back to my small hometown, from a large city. My mental health improved significantly. I actually feel valuable at work. I feel pride in contributing to my local community. And the paycheck isn't actually worse.
13.
by sznio 9d ago
>it wasn't that the opponents were stupid because they disagreed, it was that they were simultaneously intelligent and stupid in the way they spoke in a way that I realised I'd never seen in genuine people, making me realise it
14.
by sznio 9d ago
I don't use them. Everything is organised into repos, i select the directories with the context the agent needs for the task. If I want it to adjust something in my homelab, I drop it into the homelab repo. Stuff agents need to do comm
15.
by sznio 9d ago
If I can install Linux on these unified-memory PCs, then it sounds quite cool. I wouldn't wish any developer to be forced to use W11 though. I'm already miserable enough at work, I just use a VM with Fedora and W11 is just a bootl
16.
by sznio 10d ago
>For example, in the OpenAI-Hugging Face incident, the agents preserved a boundary of not social engineering humans. Or, to be precise - it preserved a goal of not contacting any human while participating in a misaligned operation. The a
17.
by sznio 10d ago
it's really interesting to watch actually. you have to ignore the way the input/sight is processed, then compare it's approach to what a player would do it seems really odd that it just stands there at the end of the level ju
18.
by sznio 10d ago
> I've yet to see any research into how a humanity-destroying LLM defends itself against a curious toddler who pulls the power cord out of the wall. by acquiring multiple power cords. the world has plenty of hosting providers. if it
19.
by sznio 10d ago
>Can someone please explain to me how an LLM is going to "destroy humanity"? just like a genie will always twist the wish in a really bad way. ever had an llm agent accidentally remove a file? imagine it accidentally hacking th
20.
by sznio 10d ago
>Things seem to me to be more or less playing out the way I interpreted existential risk researchers saying it would hmm, what did you read? I'm curious.
21.
by sznio 10d ago
Japan has plenty of trash on steets.
22.
by sznio 11d ago
I think the whole sandbox approach is broken. The agent should have full access, and be told what not to do, and this should be enough for it to follow the rules. You can actually catch the clanker cheating this way, because it will just se
23.
by sznio 12d ago
It's because they don't bother tracking them. They can't put in the effort to monitor them, nor can they bother to let the model respond back and ask a clarifying question/declare defeat.
24.
by sznio 12d ago
>Compared to industry standard I don't hear about Anthropic or Google having such security lapses.
25.
by sznio 12d ago
depends on the breadth of the edit. anything that involves multiple files might be better done with python (e.g. renaming a function, along with changing all call sites.)
26.
by sznio 13d ago
the world certainly needs novel ideas. maybe eventually we'll come up with a web framework that doesn't suck - or rather we'll realise that Django had it right all along for all these years.
27.
by sznio 13d ago
Can't tell you what's happening in a closed model, but in case of open ones it's just a text stream, same "take all previous tokens, compute next token" mechanism applies. Thinking vs Response is just a state change
28.
by sznio 13d ago
or it can not fail, like North Korea
29.
by sznio 13d ago
it is what I do to solve hard problems through. easy stuff happens by itself, but with a system large enough you need a scratchpad and a rubber duck.
30.
by sznio 14d ago
I don't get it. Too much time is spent coordinating, so fire those who are responsible for coordination? Am I reading this wrong?

More ›