systima

5 ms·

1.
The Subagent Tax(systima.ai)
1 points by systima 2mo ago|0 comments
2.
by systima 2mo ago
We are using Claude Max with OpenCode. See the post for details.
3.
by systima 2mo ago
We've updated the post now!
4.
by systima 2mo ago
UPDATE – 13/07/26: 1) We have added a repository reproducing the methods. 2) We have commented on output quality in the post (in addition to tokens/cost). 3) Per a previous update, we now handle Fable 5 in the post.
5.
by systima 2mo ago
UPDATE: After reading PUSH_AX's valid comment: ``` This is like saying contractor (A) asked for $33,000 to undertake the work and contractor (B) asked for $7,000 Are we measuring and caring about the right thing? ``` We will update the
6.
by systima 2mo ago
Anecdotally, the results from OpenCode + Claude appear to be the same if not better for our uses over the past year.
7.
by systima 2mo ago
We have never read your blog or your content before. Suspect that many have covered the "Comparing agentic coding tools" angle before, and that the differentiator is depth of analysis + conclusions.
8.
by systima 2mo ago
We are yet to try Pi!
9.
by systima 2mo ago
Model: Cost, mainly. The runs went through a Claude Max subscription rather than metered API billing, and pinning an older stable snapshot kept run-to-run comparisons clean and cheap. The fixed harness payload (system prompt plus tool schem
10.
Claude Code sends 33k tokens before reading the prompt; OpenCode sends 7k(systima.ai)
706 points by systima 2mo ago|395 comments
11.
Show HN: AI skills for program / project / delivery managers
2 points by systima 4mo ago|0 comments
12.
by systima 4mo ago
Is this allowed under Apple's ToS? I recall the Beeper Mini debacle not so long ago, and fear that this may be a house built on sand.
13.
by systima 5mo ago
How does this differ to Mastra?
14.
by systima 6mo ago
As the entire planet now knows, the Claude Code source leaked on March 31. The engineering-focused findings have been covered extensively (fake tool injection, Undercover Mode, KAIROS, etc). This piece focuses on what these findings mean if
15.
by systima 6mo ago
How does this differ to Open Code Desktop?
16.
by systima 6mo ago
Sorry, I missed part of your question: What caused the switch was that we're building AI solutions for sometimes price-conscious customers, so I was already familiar with the pattern of "Use a superior model for setting a standard
17.
by systima 6mo ago
Yes I regularly plan in Opus 4.6 and execute in “lesser” models ie MiniMax
18.
by systima 6mo ago
Open Code has been the backbone of our entire operation (we used Claude Code before it, and Cursor before that). Hugely grateful for what they do.
19.
by systima 6mo ago
I agree. In my experience, this correlates more with soft skills and “one man band” founder/maker companies that tend to sell training products or (if they do exist in a company environment at all) invariably work in DevRel and aren’t
20.
by systima 6mo ago
Thank you — Excellent points. Will think about them.
21.
by systima 6mo ago
I don’t think it’s that. I think it’s more about setting a norm and precedent that “Age verification is not our responsibility; the App Store layer does that and it’s an established truth now”. Which itself conveniently helps as a defence i
22.
by systima 6mo ago
"But there is an obvious solution: mandate the operating systems (iOS and Android) to share device users' ages when they download apps from the app stores – data the operating systems get as part of the hardware acquisition alread
23.
by systima 6mo ago
Follow what Nick Clegg has been saying post-Meta. He might give a big clue.
24.
by systima 6mo ago
Maybe https://usepec.eu ?
25.
by systima 6mo ago
Impressive! Well done
26.
Show HN: Open-Source EU AI Act Compliance Scanning for CI/CD
1 points by systima 6mo ago|0 comments
27.
by systima 7mo ago
Respectfully, this is not really engaging withe content of the post.
28.
Show HN: XML, Markdown, or JSON: Which gives LLMs the most reliable boundaries?(systima.ai)
3 points by systima 7mo ago|2 comments
29.
by systima 7mo ago
IMO what you’re describing is essentially crypto-shredding. It would definitely work (and when dealing with petabyte levels of data the simplicity of only having to delete the key is convenient). We’re leaning toward the dual-layer separati
30.
by systima 7mo ago
Great question. voxic11 is right that the AI Act creates a legal obligation that provides a lawful basis for processing under GDPR Article 6(1)(c). To add to that, Article 17(3)(b) specifically carves out an exemption to the right to erasur

More ›