synthesis

6 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by synthesis 3mo ago

   In a way, this discussion here is proof as to why human code review is necessary. - The paper is garbage, and a human review process would reject it. __As is the case in this discussion__. The sentiment of the discussion section (at the tim
2. 2.▲
   by synthesis 3mo ago

   Here is my take: - I disagree with the contributions - I suspect most of the paper was written / edited by "generative AI" It is a shame that "researchers" have started using generative AI to such a large degree as
3. 3.▲
   by synthesis 4mo ago

   This reminds me of a paper on Byzantine quorum systems "Asymmetric Distributed Trust" from 2020 by Christian Cachin and Björn Tackmann https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2019.7 . After reading said paper, I