synarchefriend

6 ms·

1.
by synarchefriend 1mo ago
You are confusing Scott Alexander with Eliezer Yudkowsky.
2.
by synarchefriend 4mo ago
Do you even believe this cope in your heart? With each month that passes you're going to keep seeing increasingly advanced bugs and mathematical proofs found by AI. And you'll have to keep coming up with increasingly silly excuses
3.
by synarchefriend 4mo ago
We have open-weight LLMs like DeepSeek that prove the cost of running inference with near-frontier models can be very cheap.
4.
by synarchefriend 10mo ago
The model is just taking the user's claim that it deleted the D drive at face value. Where is the actual command that would result in deleting the entire D drive?
5.
by synarchefriend 10mo ago
The command it supposedly ran is not provided and the spaces explanation is obvious nonsense. It is possible the user deleted their own files accidentally or they disappeared for some other reason.
6.
by synarchefriend 1y ago
What I think is happening here based on the few details: Facebook regularly suspends accounts for posting pictures of naked kids, particularly in countries which do not have strong taboos against that. These get reported and sit in a govern
7.
by synarchefriend 2y ago
You would need to be severely intellectually challenged to think Musk actually intended to give a Nazi salute. The idea is so preposterous I refuse to believe you actually believe that. Or perhaps I am underestimating how detached from real
8.
by synarchefriend 2y ago
No, that never happened.
9.
by synarchefriend 2y ago
You must be using a peculiar definition of expert because even generally conservative AI experts like LeCun now expect we could have human-level intelligence within 5 to 10 years.
10.
by synarchefriend 2y ago
The model was trained on games in PGN notation. It would be shocking if it found ASCII art easier to understand than what it was actually trained on.
11.
by synarchefriend 2y ago
Altman did deny it. https://www.fierceelectronics.com/electronics/openai-ceo-alt...
12.
by synarchefriend 2y ago
o1 can also solve many arbitrary math problems that it could not have possibly seen in its training data. And it shows the steps that it uses to do so. How do you explain this without reasoning?
13.
by synarchefriend 2y ago
"Senior employees leaving due to its powers being so extreme" This never happened. No one said it happened. "the model some media outlet reported recently that is so powerful OAI is considering charging $2k/month for&quo
14.
by synarchefriend 2y ago
Incredible that so many tech types are now cheering on the government blocking websites.
15.
by synarchefriend 2y ago
Humans also need to break up the problem and think step-by-step to solve problems like 234878 * 452.
16.
by synarchefriend 2y ago
This happened once before and the driver still wasn't paying attention at as obvious a hazard as a train crossing? Not sure I trust them to distinguish between autopilot and FSD. Although of course FSD is not actually capable of drivin
17.
by synarchefriend 3y ago
Here is a modern account of a conger eel attack (with a graphic photo). Seems they are quite vicious. https://m.independent.ie/irish-news/diver-felt-like-a-rag-do...
18.
by synarchefriend 3y ago
Another description: https://www.gutenberg.org/files/66685/66685-h/66685-h.htm Geological conditions existing in the middle of the Strait were, up to that time, almost entirely a matter of surmise, based on o
19.
by synarchefriend 3y ago
They probably want to emphasize that it's not another llama derivative.
20.
by synarchefriend 3y ago
Having an explanation doesn't mean it isn't a weird anomaly.
21.
by synarchefriend 3y ago
I believe the SmartCut feature reencodes just the frames needed to reach the closest keyframe.
22.
by synarchefriend 3y ago
Providing no access to the underlying data is far more common in other fields of science than AI.