svieira

12 ms·

1.
by svieira 6d ago
Yes, it could, but then you would have re-invented React Native. But in WASM.
2.
by svieira 14d ago
That one person is (according to the previous comment) using words to suggest "this is a thing that will happen" though they are planning to make it happen? And that those words are attributed to the God of Abraham, Isaac, and
3.
by svieira 14d ago
> A lover needs someone free to reject him As G. K. Chesterton said, > Marriage is a duel to the death, which no man of honour should decline. https://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/1718/pg1718-images.html
4.
by svieira 19d ago
Actually, everything is infused with purpose (not agency, that's different). Including rain drops and hurricanes and black holes.
5.
by svieira 20d ago
Then they are in for a very rude awakening, given that the same God says "You must not wrong the widow and the orphan; wronged, they will cry out to me for redress, and their cry will be heard. My anger will blaze out against you, an
6.
by svieira 20d ago
> And nature doesn't come with purposes, it's all something we impose on it. That is the presumption others are calling you out for. Things very clearly act appear to act with purpose, they just clearly don't provide i
7.
by svieira 20d ago
Some thinkers believe you have to encourage the people in the system and change the system to make it harder to do the wrong thing. Some reading on the topic includes: * The canonical book on the subject - The Servile State by Hilaire
8.
by svieira 23d ago
I don't think he's trying to start one, so much as he is being brainwashed by one.
9.
We Optimized the Qwen 3.6 Model for Our Junie Agent(blog.jetbrains.com)
2 points by svieira 23d ago|0 comments
10.
by svieira 1mo ago
For the end of the world was long ago, And all we dwell to-day As children of some second birth, Like a strange people left on earth After a judgment day. For the end of the world was long ago, When the ends of the world w
11.
by svieira 1mo ago
That actually makes the "Drift" analogy perfect, because you have to be "Drift compatible", you can't just grab two people off the street and throw them in a Jäger together and have it work.
12.
by svieira 2mo ago
They very often have been in the past. Why do you think this time is different?
13.
by svieira 2mo ago
So, does that mean they're selling tokens at cost ? Or that they realized they were doing 180% more work than necessary and they're passing the savings on because "your margin is my opportunity" and this is a dog-eat-d
14.
by svieira 2mo ago
My favorite analogy for LLMs is "an intellectual chain saw". It does one thing, well, but that isn't "cut wood". It's "cut". What it cuts will happily include limbs.
15.
by svieira 2mo ago
So your point is "Get the hell out of LLMs" then? As found in https://sgnt.ai/p/hell-out-of-llms/ ? Or am I still missing something about the subtleties here?
16.
by svieira 2mo ago
> if a human operator starts dropping tables or messing up numbers in a report, just because that string was in the text it read I would look at if the reaction was reasonable, and if it wasn't I would (eventually) fire the human.
17.
by svieira 2mo ago
> java.lang.String and other types don't extend JsonValue And that ladies and gentlemen is what Java's re-doing of TypeClasses (called "witness" in the experiments they're doing now) are for.
18.
by svieira 2mo ago
Or the boolean `true`, or the empty string `""`, or `null`. JSON allows bare "value"s as the root element. https://www.json.org/json-en.html
19.
by svieira 2mo ago
Precisely - except you can get it to do the same thing about the flat earth or faked moon landings or the unity of all being as will or just about anything else.
20.
by svieira 3mo ago
> I do think a Reddit with identity would be a much less toxic place. Do you remember the days of "Real name" requirements on YouTube and "Google+"? The experiment was tried, it didn't change things. (Also, see
21.
by svieira 3mo ago
Ah contraire, mon ami , I am currently in the process of doing just that in many places in my current codebase.
22.
by svieira 3mo ago
"The affliction" in his case is skin overgrowth, in the other its the dysphoria, right? But which is the moral way to cure either?
23.
by svieira 4mo ago
> If ones appearance contradicts ones inner sense of personhood, how can that person ever truly connect with other people? https://woforgmedia.wordonfire.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/0... https:/&#x2F
24.
by svieira 4mo ago
> reliably catches >99% of bugs In what scope?
25.
by svieira 4mo ago
Humans are not "reduced" to biology. Their biology is presumed to "reveal" something about their personhood. And no matter how they feel about their hair, their hips, their eyes, etc. they ought to receive them as
26.
by svieira 4mo ago
Well, he was an honored guest of the Pope for a while. Then he made fun of his host in a published book while claiming that he had a proof when he just had a theory and was told to please stop claiming that his theory required a change i
27.
by svieira 4mo ago
> Certainly, the decisive turning points in world history are substantially co-determined by souls whom no history book ever mentions. And we will only find out about those souls to whom we owe the decisive turning points in our persona
28.
by svieira 4mo ago
> Until it gets a software update, that is. The road performance of an average car AI only ever goes up. Aren't there stories about certain car companies where their self-driving-at-some-level cars got worse after an OTA update?
29.
by svieira 4mo ago
The particularly worrying thing here is that they're now going to be gathering training data for a conversational model on _how to influence people effectively even when they already know they are being influenced_. Even more than R
30.
by svieira 4mo ago
The wild thing is how much faster it is to load. I'd almost forgotten how fast Google's default search used to be. Thank you!

More ›