sutuplesu

6 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by sutuplesu 5y ago

   Pragmatic rulemaking for large numbers of people also needs to take into account the fact that the rule will naturally be viewed as a loose guideline by some people, and even as a thing to be defied for its own sake by others. Setting the l
2. 2.▲
   by sutuplesu 5y ago

   I think you're saying that musicians should not be able to have input to where their music is distributed? That's a fairly radical position. If that's not what you mean, could you expand or revise?
3. 3.▲
   by sutuplesu 5y ago

   Are they not interlinked? It seems to me that inequality often begets tribalism, as people defensively form bands. Which then reinforces the spiral downwards.
4. 4.▲
   by sutuplesu 5y ago

   > you cannot access the new object through pointers to the old The access in the caller -- `return f.x` -- is not through a pointer .
5. 5.▲
   by sutuplesu 5y ago

   Facebook's actions keep being cast as if there is a completely open, level, neutral field that the censorious fact checkers are now distorting. But that's not the starting point. Facebook already has its thumb -- if not both h
6. 6.▲
   by sutuplesu 5y ago

   > find sources you trust And those sources will consist of...who? Perhaps, people who have spent time and effort learning about the topic, a.k.a. "the experts"?
7. 7.▲
   by sutuplesu 5y ago

   I mean you can't have it both ways. If a person is counted for apportionment in a particular place, that is the place they're "represented" and it must be the place their vote counts.