superooled

5 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by superooled 3y ago

   Then she can stay at home and continue to collect her pension, and avoid breathing near small children.
2. 2.▲
   by superooled 3y ago

   1. Given that the vast majority of Covid deaths happened above retirement age, and this was pretty obvious very early on, there's very little weight to this argument. 2. What we did do in response to Covid will instead financially, e
3. 3.▲
   by superooled 3y ago

   Where I live (Wales, UK), the official government statistics on post-Covid school absences makes for troubling reading. It goes from "slight increase in absence" for middle-class kids, to "the upcoming generation will be uned
4. 4.▲
   by superooled 3y ago

   This is also an excellent argument for why we should not unthinkingly trust statements from governments, given the tools of social manipulation they have available.
5. 5.▲
   by superooled 3y ago

   Pre-Covid, it was generally accepted that downsides such as this were worthwhile for the benefits of mass education. What do you propose instead?
6. 6.▲
   by superooled 3y ago

   At least here in the UK, the official advice if a family member caught Covid was to isolate them in a separate room, with no allowances made for children. Sounds like we already tried this!
7. 7.▲
   by superooled 3y ago

   Assuming that's over 2 years, then it represents 6% of expected annual global deaths.