supermatt

5 ms·

1.
by supermatt 4d ago
> no one said it would be easy You literally said “It's not hard”
2.
by supermatt 11d ago
The shop link is still “open”.
3.
by supermatt 15d ago
Resonate and agree with this 100%.
4.
by supermatt 27d ago
How on earth does one cut the letters out so small? Any links would be most appreciated! EDIT: Seems like they post on X. heres a video with some letters being cut out. Its pretty much as you would expect, but with some serious competence!
5.
by supermatt 27d ago
Thats a better link than I originally gave so i have updated my comment with it. Thanks.
6.
by supermatt 27d ago
This is a service that will allow them to intercept your HTTP/S traffic being offered for free by a company that has been legally dead (following bankruptcy) for 12 years: https://datacvr.virk.dk/enhed/virksomhed&#
7.
by supermatt 28d ago
Sure, the problem is that people will just use humanisers if they aren't already. I don't use one because my aim is to intentionally produce the obviously LLM-sounding output as that is what I find easier to read (although as othe
8.
by supermatt 29d ago
> a very derisive rant... the derision the author clearly has... You either do not know what derisive means or have worse reading comprehension than I do! /derision Seriously though - it's literally just talking about the use o
9.
by supermatt 29d ago
My aim was to turn my ramblings into something more coherent. No more. No less. I have made longer notes using exactly the process you prescribe, but that wasn't necessary for me in this case as it wasn't the most complex of ideas
10.
by supermatt 1mo ago
> this shifts when they realise I think this is pretty much is what they were saying about the provenance being blind. If you are able to deduce the LLM usage through the long-form text then that removes the blindness and objectivity. I
11.
by supermatt 1mo ago
Thank you. Someone else posted similar with ChatGPT and it looks like that strategy could be a way for me to manually edit a lot more easily.
12.
by supermatt 1mo ago
I get you are trying to make a point but LLM generated comments aren’t permitted on HN
13.
by supermatt 1mo ago
> Fascinating seeing you get irate with people who are giving you feedback that your own thoughts are far superior to the regurgitated "cleaned up" version which is absolute garbage indeed. That is not the part I take issue wit
14.
by supermatt 1mo ago
> You didn't submit the input, you submitted the output I submit BOTH the input AND the output - that was the ENTIRE point of the post. Honestly, I beat myself up for years over having a reading disability - whereas it’s evident som
15.
by supermatt 1mo ago
Thanks. Im actually seeing that myself since someone helped me with formatting the word salad.
16.
by supermatt 1mo ago
> Yes Well you are of course entitled to disagree. > I'm not saying you are incapable of thought; I'm saying that you've abdicated that by transmitting through an LLM. What you actually said was that I "didn't
17.
by supermatt 1mo ago
I had 3 main positions - are you disagreeing with them all? You have not directly engaged with any of them. 1) Content shouldn't be judged solely on the use of an LLM. 2) There is a distinction between slop and assisted authorshi
18.
by supermatt 1mo ago
Thanks for the feedback. It's getting those abstract ideas back out from the word-vomit I find very difficult. It is almost completely impenetrable to me to read that text - even though I wrote it! Someone in another comment ( https:&#
19.
by supermatt 1mo ago
There are also many others stating the same things - and they are getting flagged and downvoted for it. Just because those of you who disagree are more vocal, downvote and flag-happy doesn't make you right.
20.
by supermatt 1mo ago
Wow, totally missed the point. Maybe you not knowing where to start was a good thing and you should have left it there and not sullied the internet with your useless ramblings.
21.
by supermatt 1mo ago
> I don't agree that it's ableism to believe that you are far more worth talking to than a machine regurgitating attenuated averages. Straw man. That literally wasn't what you said. You dismissed what I wrote as thoughtles
22.
by supermatt 1mo ago
Huh, thats really interesting... That sounds a lot better than I expected, and is readable enough for me to edit it. Thank you :)
23.
by supermatt 1mo ago
I haven't always struggled so much, but my ability to read has severely diminished over the past decade. I find it much easier to communicate in short form. It has always been disproportionately time-consuming for me to write though. I
24.
by supermatt 1mo ago
> which is barely any at all Clearly you either didn't read it, misunderstood it, disbelieved it, or just DGAF :)
25.
by supermatt 1mo ago
How is this? https://claude.ai/share/99bfee0f-bab9-4593-aabb-377e71f1151d
26.
by supermatt 1mo ago
> I believe you believe you did Wow, peak ableism. It is a post about how I use an LLM as an accessibility aid for reading and writing. We're not all out here faking creative writing you know...
27.
by supermatt 1mo ago
The problem is that some people think all AI-assisted writing is prompting "write me a post about X", so they see LLM prose and assume there has been no thought or effort put into it.
28.
by supermatt 1mo ago
Yes, I did. That was the whole point of the post.
29.
by supermatt 1mo ago
Because some people are just ignorant and downvote anything they either aren't willing or able to understand :)
30.
by supermatt 1mo ago
I submit pretty much the opposite of this, but it didn't gain any traction: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49332291

More ›