supergnu

5 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by supergnu 4y ago

   I mean, that is already happening. Almost all modern TV's do some signal processing before outputting the pixels, and the image looks slightly different on each model. But it'd definitely be cool to have some latent representation
2. 2.▲
   by supergnu 4y ago

   neither does AI. They don't operate in pixel space, but in latent space, which is the same as a mental model and the neural networks that do this even have a lot in common with how our visual cortex works. The conversion to pixel only
3. 3.▲
   by supergnu 4y ago

   so you say what disqualifies AI is that it's a lot faster than humans at doing the same task
4. 4.▲
   by supergnu 4y ago

   why not? human artists do exactly the same thing - combine learned patterns into new compositions.
5. 5.▲
   by supergnu 4y ago

   the only truly illegal thing is to not have enough money
6. 6.▲
   by supergnu 4y ago

   It's most of all not in the best interest of GI's bank account when people learn that they can generate any image they desire - for free.
7. 7.▲
   by supergnu 4y ago

   This is purely a PR move. They don't ban AI content because of fears of legal challenges, but because they see their entire business model fall to pieces. Why would anyone license images from them when they instead can generate any ima