super_normal

6 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by super_normal 2y ago

   how about a totallynotcardcountingbench lottery, as well?
2. 2.▲
   by super_normal 2y ago

   brah i beat this game in 4.5 seconds yall dont even know about the epic skip i found el oh l
3. 3.▲
   by super_normal 2y ago

   beat the captcha first try on a pixel 6. true gaming legend signing out, el oh el oh el...
4. 4.▲
   by super_normal 2y ago

   yes. your code is what i was intending to check, after all. i got confused that the '10' might represent some kind of sub-sub string. what happened was simple, i dont have access to a good haskell environment and 'claude 3.5
5. 5.▲
   by super_normal 2y ago

   my bad. claude 3.5 sonnet was lying to me. i tried to get it to check itself and it gave me back nonsense 3 times in a row. i just decided to check this property on irrationals and he hallucinated that the counts were more even than the fac
6. 6.▲
   by super_normal 2y ago

   id prefer it if you would write this in haskell so i can understand what is going on there better. i am saying of the first 1,000 digits after the ones place, each digit of the sequence appears an even number of times, every consecutive sub
7. 7.▲
   by super_normal 2y ago

   yes. and i think this is perfect up to three. no other number i tested was anywhere close to this, and i suspect it may lead to an important new metric. please verify. (and i should add i think it also means that all the counts are complete
8. 8.▲
   I think I just discovered supernormalcy

   3 points by super_normal 2y ago|7 comments