sunstealer

6 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by sunstealer 10y ago

   To me, and I think many other outsiders, putting a lot of emphasis on the equivalent of grammars-language-automata looks like mathematical naivety. I don't say this to be rude but because you (and Chomsky) claim to be able to interpre
2. 2.▲
   by sunstealer 10y ago

   Thanks, will do!
3. 3.▲
   by sunstealer 10y ago

   Chomsky's reasoning is that the arbitrary complexity (recursive structure) of human language implies some sort of low level computational engine to do the relevant computations. I don't have an opinion either way. We can see tha
4. 4.▲
   by sunstealer 10y ago

   As a smart person, I see things a different way. There are certain hobbies that are only appeal to smart people, like pure math. But there are a lot of things that appeal to a broad range of people, like sport, arts, music and literature.