submain

6 ms·

1.
by submain 5d ago
The documentation is really hard to read. It's full of claudisms and verbosity. I highly recommend you to do a human review on the whole thing.
2.
by submain 7d ago
Which is why we need competition. Which is almost non-existent in US healthcare as comparing prices is near impossible.
3.
by submain 13d ago
Unproven, but it could very well be some problems require consciousness to be solved.
4.
by submain 13d ago
It's amazing how exhausting AI text is to read.
5.
by submain 17d ago
Likewise. I signed up for woodworking classes. I think I'm in for a rude awakening.
6.
by submain 2mo ago
NVidia seems to want them. They have a lot of lobbying power.
7.
by submain 3mo ago
Not op, but I use it for seeing the joystick + throttle and the "real" instruments in flight simulator.
8.
by submain 3mo ago
The investors will get their money back on the IPO. They'll dump all their stocks in the market and run away, leaving retail with the bill.
9.
by submain 3mo ago
I think that's a fair take. We could also frame it as society in the past has carried a lot of the burden of raising kids. Tribes and communities helped raise kids. That's no longer true in an individualistic and institutionalized
10.
by submain 3mo ago
Is that enough though? Women change their entire bodies, sacrifice years of their lives, and go through considerable stress to have a baby. And at the end, the benefits of that ordeal are not clear. Society would need to offer something to
11.
by submain 3mo ago
I agree. It comes down to the opportunity cost for women to have babies. On pre-industrialized societies, women have barely a choice. On industrialized ones they do. And it turns out that, when given the choice, they choose not to have babi
12.
by submain 4mo ago
It seems to me China is chasing widespread adoption, while the US is chasing the AGI dream.
13.
by submain 5mo ago
I have been doing this and the results have been fairly good. I use claude to build requirements.md -> implementation.md -> todo.md. Then I tell opencode + openrouter to read those files and follow the todo using a cheap (many times f
14.
by submain 5mo ago
Great work :). Go doesn't have TCO. That means functional languages (no for loops) could blow up the stack. How did you solve that?
15.
by submain 7mo ago
> And don't even let me get started on how bad Claude client has become The latest versions of claude code have been freezing and then crashing while waiting on long running commands. It's pretty frustrating.
16.
by submain 7mo ago
bots perhaps? Anyways, mods should remove this post.
17.
by submain 8mo ago
> If you search for problems on linux, you will get much higher quality answers. Not only that, but in the past I've cooked hacky bash scripts to work around issues while waiting for upstream fixes. I'd imagine that'd be h
18.
by submain 9mo ago
I usually define functional programming as "how far away a language is from untyped lambda calculus". By that definition, different languages would fall in different parts of that spectrum.
19.
by submain 9mo ago
> The real secret to agent productivity is letting go of your understanding of the code and trusting the AI to generate the proper thing The few times I've done that, the agent eventually faced a problem/bug it couldn't so
20.
by submain 9mo ago
"Magic Leap raises $827M in Series C". Aged like wine.
21.
by submain 9mo ago
This is great! Coincidentally, I just started replacing my collection of bespoke security bash scripts with an app like yours. WIP here: https://github.com/leolimasa/age-vault We all keep reinventing the same thing :)
22.
by submain 10mo ago
Yeah, I run macos for the same reason. However, I went back to linux on my personal laptop (nixos on my case) and I am pleasantly surprised how many things now just work. The only thing that still annoys me is the laptop not sleeping proper
23.
by submain 1y ago
This echoes my sentiment that LLMs are higher level programming languages. And, as every layer of abstraction, they add assumptions that may or may not fit the use case. The same way we optimize SQL queries by knowing how the database makes
24.
by submain 2y ago
Type checking is indeed an advantage of ORMs. You pay for it with object relational impedance mismatch. That impedance grows as your schema grows. In my experience, the way to get the best of both worlds is to use a query builder as opposed
25.
by submain 2y ago
ORMs are one of those things that make sense for really tiny projects but fail to scale once complexity settles in.
26.
by submain 2y ago
I love doing research. I published a minor unimportant paper in undergrad and had a blast doing it. Then at graduation I was offered a well paid job in the industry. Decided to pursue it as opposed to spending 5-6 more years in academia loo
27.
by submain 2y ago
>What does windows 7 do that windows 10 doesn't? Why does the same web page need 60MBs to load when it only need 1-3MB 10 years ago. Ads. And tracking code to serve you ads. And AI - that collects your prompts to serve you more ads
28.
by submain 2y ago
This is great! How does it compare to silverbullet ( https://silverbullet.md/ )?
29.
by submain 2y ago
As a manager, if upstream changes priorities on me but what we’re working on is almost done, I just go ahead and finish it anyways. When they eventually switch back to the original thing they are always surprised to know it’s been completed
30.
by submain 2y ago
I am not familiar with LiveView, so I'm curious. Looks like it processes UI actions server side. So, are all client interactions sent through the websocket? I remember years/decades ago we used to do that with ASP.NET, where every

More ›