strafer32

5 ms·

1.
by strafer32 12y ago
That good to hear that he's still been active, thanks.
2.
by strafer32 12y ago
You ask in what way are your comments abusive. I believe you to be trolling because of your style of argument. You say things like [1]: "Gert (and his supporters), do you also hate women, blacks and jews as much as you hate gays, and d
3.
by strafer32 12y ago
I have not badmouthed the new CEO Mozilla at all. This is a thread about the new CTO. Note that I don't criticize the new CTO for his religious or other beliefs. I criticize him for not having the people skills to perform his job. Give
4.
by strafer32 12y ago
cpeterso got the idea from other Mozilla employees. The "he as offered to stay as CEO" grew legs when employees started responding on the governance newsgroup to people complaining about the firing. One person (Yoric I think) said
5.
by strafer32 12y ago
Are you also the Don Hopkins being abusive and trolling on the comment threads of Gerv Markham's blog [1]? [1] http://blog.gerv.net/2014/04/your-ire-is-misdirected/
6.
by strafer32 12y ago
I'm familiar with the governance structure of Mozilla. I'm not a distinguished engineer or anything, but familiar enough. There are employees parroting that Brendan is still has an important position in the structure. Brendan&#x27
7.
by strafer32 12y ago
He may be but as he says himself, that's not much involvement: http://dutherenverseauborddelatable.wordpress.com/2014/04/07...
8.
by strafer32 12y ago
He does not know otherwise and is mistaken. When Brendan's comment dispelling the rumour that he'd been offered to remain as CEO it was brought up in the Mozilla governance newsgroup and other places. Mitchell Baker clarified that
9.
by strafer32 12y ago
Andreas is not a great choice. His people skills are terrible. They are so bad that he no longer writes his own emails to employees. They have to go through a PA to make sure they have a human element. The @RealAndreasGal twitter account th