stoperaticless

6 ms·

1.
by stoperaticless 2y ago
Could two particles be: anti proton and anti electron? (What conservation law would it violate?)
2.
by stoperaticless 2y ago
I think you want me to address the policy, that you linked to. Well, the wiki’s policy is irrelevant. Or only 50% relevant. I see that the policy tries to provide some “spirit of the law” and/or hints to avoid edit wars and such, but e
3.
by stoperaticless 2y ago
Wiki, open source projects, stackoverflow and democratic country, all are different, but they definitely have similarities. Established old-timers have significantly more authority than newbies in any organisation. Trust built over time mat
4.
by stoperaticless 2y ago
Maintainer stance is understandable. They are the ones taking on the risks and who will be left dealing with consequences. Flyby contributors don’t know how much effort there is to keep things going even at good enough level. It’s up to the
5.
by stoperaticless 2y ago
> Sort of like if you have an infinite number of coin flips then at some place and time you'll land on heads a million times in a row, no matter how unlikely. If random event result is any real (i.e. not limited integers and fract
6.
by stoperaticless 2y ago
I want to highlight, that extra bad part is keeping the name “json parser”. (Naming it my-custom-format parser would circumvent ambiguity)
7.
by stoperaticless 2y ago
That possible when you control the creation process. Frequently you can’t control the creation (e.g.external system)
8.
by stoperaticless 2y ago
Also, “well being of people” < “military stuff”
9.
by stoperaticless 2y ago
Strong/weak types and static/dynamic typing are orthogonal things. Strong type system limits things like 1+”1”. Static type system requires type declarations (“int i”). Python always had strong dynamic types.
10.
by stoperaticless 2y ago
There is no way to unambiguosly decide who is responsible for which earnings. Hipothetical two people cooperative that produces simple hammers. One specializes on wooden part, the other on metal part. How much each of them earned to the com
11.
by stoperaticless 2y ago
I’d add that the answer was clearly over the top, thus sarcastic, thus he is agreement with his soldiers.
12.
by stoperaticless 2y ago
I’m also intrigued and waiting for op to elaborate. Constant that I see: There is power hierarchy(ies) at all times, even if individuals change (necessary for any kind of coordination). Some related things: - to get more power one has to ac
13.
by stoperaticless 2y ago
Could you expand on why is it easily prosecutable? I sense that it has something to do with lying in documents. But hypothetically: if I write “no”. Proof of lying requires proof of terrorism. (At which point you did all the job of proving
14.
by stoperaticless 2y ago
> Like if someone is accused of murder, This analogy has issues. Topic is war. As far as international law is concerned, it’s “ok” to shoot people, blow them up and maim them. I would propose analogy from a contact sport like mma (or t
15.
by stoperaticless 2y ago
Analysis regarding latencies and packet loss due to cut cables: https://labs.ripe.net/author/emileaben/does-the-internet-rou...
16.
by stoperaticless 2y ago
It depends on the region. My neibhours never heard about the need to “denazify” us from Google’s home government. War is much much worse than google. (Btw. Kagi is nice alternative, where you are the customer, not the product) > what is
17.
by stoperaticless 2y ago
> I wish I lived in a world where it's so easy to know who is good and who is evil War and killings turn up the contrast, converting shades of gray to black and white, people to friends and enemies. I rather would live in peacetime,
18.
by stoperaticless 2y ago
What does it mean to be “nuclear tipped”? As in uses depleted uranium (because of density characteristics) or radioactive waste stuff just for being radioactive? (Obviously mass of tomahawk is too low for any chain nuclear reaction)
19.
by stoperaticless 2y ago
I guess it’s one way to frame it. The other could be: Somebody is refusing to pay protection money and is forming a “neighbourhood watch”. We need to make example of them.
20.
by stoperaticless 2y ago
What?
21.
by stoperaticless 2y ago
According to wikipedia. Headquarters: Moscow, Russia
22.
by stoperaticless 2y ago
It is not the time to call “but US also did it” card. When thug attacks, what do you do?
23.
by stoperaticless 2y ago
> You are dealing with a thug, not a cost/benefit accountant Spot on.
24.
by stoperaticless 2y ago
These broke cables have not affected daily lives (possibly ISPs had extra work though)
25.
by stoperaticless 2y ago
Have you draged anchor for 100+km?
26.
by stoperaticless 2y ago
Action does not need to be immediate. Plan is clear: continue suppporting Ukraine, continue Russian isolation.
27.
by stoperaticless 2y ago
Well, you never know 100%. There is a small (really small) chance it was an accident. Just like there is a small chance that Al Capone was innocent man. (But really, it clearly has “Russia” written all over it)
28.
by stoperaticless 2y ago
Other end of this spectrum is ever growing “utils” package.
29.
by stoperaticless 2y ago
Whats wrong with tooling enforcing it? I mean, where you wrap is not important, and is best left to tooling (brain cycles and meeting time can be used for more important things)
30.
by stoperaticless 2y ago
It indicates importance of the topic and hardness of disgreement. Tabs vs spaces - people disagree but usually can adapt to the team if needed. Use java1.4 for green-field web app - hard disagreement for many, looking for new job is more at

More ›