stoltzmann

6 ms·

1.
by stoltzmann 23d ago
>the whole tax system, shares, and holding management You don't have to set up a holding management structure for your company. It's there if you want to, but why make it complicated if you don't want a complicated structu
2.
by stoltzmann 2mo ago
>OpenWRT is very good, but the installation and upgrades are not easy. The solution is to use image-builder and bake your config into the image.
3.
by stoltzmann 4mo ago
Facebook already requires verifying your ID in some cases, it's absolutely feasible for them to do it online. If it's not feasible, I can see an argument that large enough companies should be required to provide in person support
4.
by stoltzmann 4mo ago
>The result is that European hi-tech entrepreneurs create their businesses in a friendlier environment, which is usually the USA. The inverse of that is that this creates a huge market in the EU, where you don't have to be the best
5.
by stoltzmann 5mo ago
I've implemented timers that had timeouts using unix timestamps, but only for multiplayer - when a player's attempt to connect to the server times out, etc. Inside the game loop, we would keep the global tick counter that incremen
6.
by stoltzmann 6mo ago
>I can assure you from having flown around a lot, if you are wildly outnumbered 3 SU-27 (err, F15) to your 1 F-18 you do not attempt a radar lock you do an IR only attack. The article mentions getting a radar lock first but that is unnec
7.
by stoltzmann 9mo ago
It certainly feels like we are being squeezed from all sides. I think the push to require ID verification for websites is also part of the plot - it all feels too coordinated, like governments all over the world have the same exact agenda t
8.
by stoltzmann 10mo ago
And IIRC ammo for heavy and health for soldier!
9.
by stoltzmann 10mo ago
Stop being a clown and just write down the fucking name if you want to complain that badly.
10.
by stoltzmann 11mo ago
>connected to their wifi Absolutely, it's their own network. >being brought to their premises Depends on the local laws. Where I live, they can either deal with it, or provide a secured storage space for the duration of the visit
11.
by stoltzmann 11mo ago
>Many corporations require personal devices be managed to support remote wiping. Corporations cannot require you to have your personal devices be managed by them. If you're surrendering your own gear to a company, it stops being you
12.
by stoltzmann 11mo ago
So a reimplementation, not a rewrite.
13.
by stoltzmann 1y ago
This is besides the point. The lead dev started going on a rant when facing a comment as simple as "this is informative, and unfortunate" on a video that he didn't like, and is unable to parse that statement as anything else
14.
by stoltzmann 1y ago
He didn't step away. He made a post where he "stepped down" as the project lead and instead got replaced by a "GrapheneOS Foundation director", of which there are 3 including him. That post has been deleted. As far
15.
by stoltzmann 1y ago
Damn, if only we had some form of technology that would let a user allow or reject access to system APIs. Sadly this is impossible and cannot be implemented.
16.
by stoltzmann 1y ago
I would say that not having any video output is a worse user experience than having blurry video output.
17.
by stoltzmann 1y ago
F-16 was the first inherently unstable jet fighter, and the first one that featured a full fly-by-wire system with no backup. If you want a jet that is completely impossible to fly without a computer, F-16 is already one of them - there is
18.
by stoltzmann 1y ago
Well, he did facilitate drug trade. I wouldn't call that "not doing anything wrong". Whether you believe it's morally right or wrong, that doesn't matter - he did violate several high profile laws.
19.
by stoltzmann 1y ago
By for example destroying the enemy launch platforms. By intercepting enemy flights that would deploy those weapons. And specifically in case of F-35s, also by providing ELINT. "Hypersonic" weapons used in current conflicts are no
20.
by stoltzmann 1y ago
Both me and my friend are playing on the community server where the cheaters are banned, neither of us are getting eaten.
21.
by stoltzmann 1y ago
>And the admins, even paid ones working for big corporations, have finite patience and time. We're talking community servers here, not corporate ones. >Sure, the cheater will eventually run out of IPs. But you might as well save
22.
by stoltzmann 1y ago
>rotating through a few VPNs can easily get you a few thousand different IPs It's not uncommon to ban all addresses coming from a datacenter, which will stop the majority of VPNs. That leaves significantly fewer addresses from resid
23.
by stoltzmann 1y ago
>but these can all be evaded And then they'll be banned again and again. There's only a limited amount of IPs available to cheaters, it won't be long before they burn through all of them.
24.
by stoltzmann 1y ago
So which one is better? sntrup761x25519-sha512 or mlkem768x25519-sha256?
25.
by stoltzmann 1y ago
That traditional wisdom is wrong. ECC is a must-have for any computer. The only reason people think ECC is mandatory for ZFS is because it exposes errors due to inherent checksumming and most other filesystems don't, even if they suffe
26.
by stoltzmann 1y ago
Why not? It actually sounds like the best way to use passkeys and still have control over them.
27.
by stoltzmann 1y ago
>I do not understand how this got rolled out. Surely there are _loads_ of multilingual people working at YouTube. Simple - at Google, feedback from internal users is ignored.
28.
by stoltzmann 1y ago
You can get some other antennas, place them in the chassis and connect them to the network card. On (at least the first run of) MNT Reform laptops that's how it's done.
29.
by stoltzmann 1y ago
You could take a normal laptop and remove the screen.
30.
by stoltzmann 2y ago
It's from attacks by German submarines. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Happy_Time

More ›