stitched2gethr

7 ms·

1.
by stitched2gethr 4mo ago
Without saying that I think LLMs are alive, I do think it matters. I have personally been cruel to an LLM in ways that would make me ashamed if I suddenly understand that it had feelings.
2.
by stitched2gethr 5mo ago
Try this: `claude --model claude-opus-4-6`
3.
by stitched2gethr 5mo ago
> Anthropic already has a tool for it Yes, but Anthropic built this tool after OpenClaw, because of OpenClaw.
4.
by stitched2gethr 5mo ago
A question asking how your project compares to x so I don't have to do the research for myself.
5.
by stitched2gethr 6mo ago
This is intriguing. On another note, I do not understand how posts make it to the top of the front page with essentially no comments.
6.
by stitched2gethr 6mo ago
https://www.linkedin.com/posts/nicolaschaillan_there-you-hav...
7.
by stitched2gethr 6mo ago
Try proxymock. It's not open source but it is free to use.
8.
by stitched2gethr 6mo ago
It's not ready to make important decisions. But that's not the same as making important contributions.
9.
by stitched2gethr 6mo ago
We're way past that.
10.
by stitched2gethr 7mo ago
Insane. I'm terrified and I can't wait.
11.
Gartner: Market Guide for API and MCP Testing Tools(gartner.com)
4 points by stitched2gethr 7mo ago|0 comments
12.
by stitched2gethr 7mo ago
It all depends on the model and how much you use it of course. We're running Opus 4.6 and on a light day it spends a dollar or two. This is just a few simple operations like "create a ticket for ..." and it's regular h
13.
by stitched2gethr 7mo ago
We did the same and I wrote (admittedly had AI write) about it. https://speedscale.com/blog/building-speedy-autonomous-ai-de...
14.
by stitched2gethr 7mo ago
I had to scroll too far to find this take. 100%. This is like saying the CLAUDE.md or AGENTS.md is irrelevant because the LLM generated it.
15.
by stitched2gethr 7mo ago
It's all about how full the context is, right? For a task that can be completed in 20% of the context it doesn't matter, but you don't want to fill your context with exploration before you do the hard part. I have actually f
16.
by stitched2gethr 7mo ago
I think that's partly the point. This is the tool that everyone wanted but couldn't quite describe. Not saying he's a genius, but he was the first to will it into existence.
17.
by stitched2gethr 7mo ago
Try running `/insights` with Claude Code.
18.
by stitched2gethr 7mo ago
I think the rationale is that with the right tools you can move much faster, and not burn everything to the ground, than just rawdogging Claude. If you haven't bothered setting up extra tools you may still be faster / better than
19.
by stitched2gethr 7mo ago
I think it also presumes that the skills of today won't be helpful in making you better, faster, stronger at knowing what to learn tomorrow. Skateboarding ain't snowboarding but I guarantee the experience helps.
20.
by stitched2gethr 7mo ago
And how are you using it now? Have you seen real value weeks or months on?
21.
by stitched2gethr 7mo ago
This is what we're working on at Speedscale. Our methods use traffic capture and replay to validate what worked before still works today.
22.
by stitched2gethr 8mo ago
Perhaps if he was able to get Claude Code to do what he wanted in less time, and with a better experience, then maybe that's not a skill he (or the rest of us) want to develop.
23.
by stitched2gethr 10mo ago
Getting an old codebase working is something they are especially good at because it has regular, actionable feedback and it's clear when the tall is complete. Creating the "best" anything is much more open ended.
24.
by stitched2gethr 10mo ago
I'm surprised there was no mention of shorts which take attention away from long form content. It's all they a pushing these days. In my feed I regularly see 6 shorts, then a video, then 6 more shorts. TikTok is not the ideal mode
25.
by stitched2gethr 11mo ago
I've seen it many times. And then every task takes longer than the last one, which is what pushes teams to start rewrites. "There's never enough time to do it right, but always time to do it again."
26.
by stitched2gethr 1y ago
Na. Consenting adults and all that.
27.
by stitched2gethr 1y ago
There were developed around the same time so maybe that accounts for some of the comparisons, but at least in this case I think it matters that they are both relatively new languages with modern tooling.
28.
by stitched2gethr 1y ago
https://web.archive.org/web/20250920171201/https://www.busin...
29.
by stitched2gethr 1y ago
This contains some specific data with pretty graphs: https://youtu.be/tbDDYKRFjhk?t=623 But if you do professional development and use something like Claude Code (the current standard, IMO) you'll quickly get a handle
30.
by stitched2gethr 1y ago
> I think you've actually lost that time in the first case. And in the second case, as opposed to the middle ground.

More ›