steezeburger

5 ms·

1.
by steezeburger 19d ago
> Can't complain if I keep choosing hostile products for some convenience Uh, yeah you can.
2.
by steezeburger 19d ago
It's the worst on iPhone, because it won't even let me scroll back up to show the button to open the tabs view, I have to switch out of the browser and re-open it to be able to scroll to show.
3.
by steezeburger 29d ago
https://www.wheresyoured.at/what-happens-if-openai-dies/#ant... > I think it’s very unlikely this happens, and if it does, it would be ruinous for everybody involved. The full snippet is in TFA.
4.
by steezeburger 2mo ago
I agree with you about the merits of journaling, but I think there is a place for this kind of app still. I don't use this specific app, but I like the idea of a single dumping ground that is sorted and reviewed by AI, but not necessar
5.
by steezeburger 2mo ago
I like the idea behind this a lot and feel the same way about my notes. I also built my own app for it and have a very similar feature on the roadmap. Cool stuff!
6.
by steezeburger 2mo ago
From the Github README: > Dowe is a Rust compiler and runtime toolchain for building fullstack products from a unified, declarative source graph. Applications are authored in Dowe Source Format (.dowe), checked against explicit language
7.
by steezeburger 2mo ago
Every daily log is the same as the dirt notebook. It reduces friction when going to create a note because you don't have to think about where to file the note _before_ it's even written. I tag things and can sort them later, if I
8.
by steezeburger 2mo ago
I have a similar idea in the note taking app I've written for myself over a couple years. I have a new daily page everyday with a simple but powerful tagging system. Adding automation soon that will be kick ass, but for now the mcp ser
9.
by steezeburger 2mo ago
You mean it's better than the speechify cloud provided voices?
10.
by steezeburger 3mo ago
You can only check your email so many times, and you can only work on so many problems at once. You also generally have to be mindful of token consumption. I think it also leads to burnout to work on so much at once. I've been working
11.
by steezeburger 3mo ago
I find it hard to stay engaged doing this. I do get good results, but it's just hard to not get distracted when it's doing the work.
12.
by steezeburger 3mo ago
This is why my favorite book is Thinking, Fast & Slow. It blew my mind and totally made me think about almost everything differently. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thinking,_Fast_and_Slow
13.
by steezeburger 3mo ago
It's tough if you're somewhere that isn't very meaningful to you beyond the technology. I think there will be an existential shift soon towards more fulfilling work. Maybe I'm naive or that's just what I feel I need
14.
by steezeburger 3mo ago
I had that same issue with a Tauri rust app recently. It just ran as fast as it possible could. Made my phone heat up.
15.
by steezeburger 3mo ago
It was definitely amazing, especially as a creator. It's how I learned to program! Actionscript was my first language. The only thing kinda close to the experience now is Processing. There may have been issues with the tech, but it kic
16.
by steezeburger 3mo ago
Before the PSP had a legit browser, you could get online by exploiting Wipeout Pure's update or dlc d/l mechanism. https://pyra-handheld.com/boards/threads/the-new-psp-web-bro...
17.
by steezeburger 3mo ago
Yeah that would be great. I seriously don't understand how a company with this much money doesn't have some of the more basic ux implemented to make it a really great app. Blows my mind.
18.
by steezeburger 4mo ago
That hasn't been my experience. freetaxusa has been pretty great honestly.
19.
by steezeburger 4mo ago
Why pay for tax software? What's wrong with the free tax submission website?
20.
by steezeburger 4mo ago
Does it just make it easier to get in a position you want or does it give you more natural looking positions as well or any other benefits? It's pretty fun to play with!
21.
by steezeburger 4mo ago
I've had pretty good luck with using playwright mcp to test web front ends. I think LLMs can totally test GUIs. Either via vision and computer control or via reading the GUI node tree (e.g. DOM) used by whatever you built the GUI with.
22.
by steezeburger 4mo ago
I think it's just the wrong metric to optimize for _first_. It's not generally a bad metric to keep tabs on though. Make it work, make it right, make it fast? Or something like that.
23.
by steezeburger 4mo ago
Yeah I totally agree! I also think people should still be reading as much code as they can. That's always been true imo. It is just hard to keep up with it now because of how much code an LLM can generate for $20/month. I do think
24.
by steezeburger 4mo ago
Experience is so so valuable right now. We can guide these agents super well, but I do fear for the juniors as you said. I would like to think I'd use the agents to dive deeper and learn faster. It was pretty rough piecing together sol
25.
by steezeburger 4mo ago
I've been thinking a lot about the new primitives and paradigms we'll see.
26.
by steezeburger 4mo ago
I enjoy using and orchestrating agents a lot to build software, but have never really had the desire to replace my writing with LLMs. I don't write a whole whole lot, so maybe I just don't have enough writing to do to make it appe
27.
by steezeburger 4mo ago
I'm actually not sure what you're saying. Are you implying inline 2d graphics are the same as inline 3d graphics? That's what the subtitle of Ratty was about. And that's not what was shown in original comment's vide
28.
by steezeburger 4mo ago
So you're saying that the Xerox workstation didn't have inline 3d graphics rendering capabilities? And in fact this isn't an instance of UNIX trying to catch up to Xerox workstations' REPL from yester-decade?
29.
by steezeburger 4mo ago
But that's not what was relevant to their comment. "Here's this new thing that can Ⓧ!" "Pfft, Y could do X years ago." Well, Ⓧ ≠ X. Come on now, we're programmers here.
30.
by steezeburger 4mo ago
I think the original comment is actually a poorly chosen example vs me having a poorly chosen counter-complaint.

More ›