Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
staticassertion
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
7 ms
·
151.
▲
by
staticassertion
5mo ago
I'm in agreement. It's the article that made the sweeping statement.
152.
▲
by
staticassertion
5mo ago
Hey, fair enough! To each their own.
153.
▲
by
staticassertion
5mo ago
Was cost the reason you went for it over tirzepitide? I feel like retatrutide is still way too early to mess with, it's giving me real "vioxx" vibes of messing with too much at once.
154.
▲
by
staticassertion
5mo ago
> these are not drugs that anyone can safely take without guidance. Unless that risk is egregious, informed adults should be able to accept it if they so choose.
155.
▲
by
staticassertion
5mo ago
I assume they're referring to the brief bit in the post that indicates that oral ingestion leads to a breakdown that makes oral supplements of amino acids pointless. They say it very briefly and they don't really outright assert i
156.
▲
by
staticassertion
5mo ago
Even if you hadn't lost any muscle mass, zero chance you're going to see the same exercise performance on a calorie deficit.
157.
▲
by
staticassertion
5mo ago
The article frames these supplements as being purely appealing to "anti science" people but I think that's really unfair. You can believe in medication, believe in science, trust government systems, etc, and still feel like y
158.
▲
by
staticassertion
5mo ago
I think it's disingenuous to frame this exclusively in terms of the people who are turning down medically approved options for unknown supplements. Dealing with doctors is kind of a pain in the ass. I was very sick a month ago and my d
159.
▲
by
staticassertion
5mo ago
Sounds like there's some debate to be had here...
160.
▲
by
staticassertion
5mo ago
> It's really not. A service adds complexity. If you have no reason to add it besides to "reduce complexity" - that is an oxymoron. No, it really is. I can just as easily say that a system is simpler when it's composi
161.
▲
by
staticassertion
5mo ago
I have wondered this as well. Maybe it's trying to train based on which accounts get flagged/ time-to-flag or something? Otherwise... who would bother with this? It's so dumb.
162.
▲
by
staticassertion
5mo ago
This is also extremely common with LLMs, in my experience. They grep, find something, make it `pub`, etc.
163.
▲
by
staticassertion
5mo ago
Great, then I'll tell you. It's a bunch of FedRAMP certified Microsoft services.
164.
▲
by
staticassertion
5mo ago
> Aren't libraries just "services" without some transport layer / gateway? Libraries can share memory, mutable state, etc. Services can not. > (it inherently does not) That's going to be debatable.
165.
▲
by
staticassertion
6mo ago
What's the most common architecture you see for CMMC enclaves, especially those built by outside consulting firms?
166.
▲
by
staticassertion
6mo ago
The "time" part is what I don't get. If you want to say that "resetting and reingesting all context fresh" somehow causes a problem, that I can see. If you want to say that the immutability of the weights is a probl
167.
▲
by
staticassertion
6mo ago
I'm not understanding how this is analogous to being killed every 5 seconds as opposed to being paused. Let's call it N seconds, unless you think length matters? > And that computation is equivalent to reading the compressed fo
168.
▲
by
staticassertion
6mo ago
I noted that there are people who work on designing those sorts of tests and answering these questions and then I described what good evidence would look like.
169.
▲
by
staticassertion
6mo ago
So what? If a human were unconscious every 5 seconds for 100ms, would you say they are "less conscious"? Tokens are still causally connected, which feels sufficient.
170.
▲
by
staticassertion
6mo ago
As opposed to what? There are still causal connections, which feel sufficient. A presentist would reject the concept of multiple "times" to begin with.
171.
▲
by
staticassertion
6mo ago
> If we think of human emotions the same way, just evolution's way of nudging behavior I think we basically do, the only interesting bit is our perception of phenomenal experiences.
172.
▲
by
staticassertion
6mo ago
There are fields that focus on these areas and numerous ideas around what the criteria would be. One of the common understandings is that recurrent processing is likely a foundational layer for consciousness, and agents do not have this cur
173.
▲
by
staticassertion
6mo ago
What do you mean exist outside of time? They definitely don't exist outside of any causal chain - tokens follow other tokens in order. Gaps in which no processing occurs seems sort of irrelevant to me. The main limitation I'd poin
174.
▲
by
staticassertion
6mo ago
I have no idea what you're talking about. This has nothing to do with having "better fedramp certs". If you are setting up fedramp or cmmc you will be heavily, heavily pressured and incentivized to do so with Microsoft toolin
175.
▲
by
staticassertion
6mo ago
This isn't it at all. AWS does not have the same sorts of insane cross-tenancy exploits that Azure has had, for example. The reason that Azure has so many customers is very simply because Azure is borderline mandated by the US govern
176.
▲
by
staticassertion
6mo ago
Depending on the space you work in, you have almost no choice at all. If you're building for government then you're going to use Microsoft, almost "end of story".
177.
▲
by
staticassertion
6mo ago
It is so hard to test those codebases too. A lot of the time there's IO and implicit state changes through the code. Even getting testing in place, let alone good testing, is often an incredibly difficult task. And no one will refactor
178.
▲
by
staticassertion
6mo ago
It "means nothing" that the way that government systems get set up for government data is all using Microsoft tooling?
179.
▲
by
staticassertion
6mo ago
> I've been involved with FEDRAMP initiatives in the past. That doesn't mean as much as you'd think. Some really atrocious systems have been FEDRAMP certified. Maybe when you go all the way to FEDRAMP High there could be s
180.
▲
by
staticassertion
6mo ago
> The current plans are likely to fail — history has proven that hunch correct — so I began creating new ones to rebuild the Azure node stack from first principles. > A simple cross-platform component model to create portable modules
More ›