stale2001

6 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by stale2001 12y ago

   You completely missed the point of the article. Yes, he acted naively, and assumed that the company that he was working for would act in good faith. Thats not the point. The point is that this is a terrible company that acted in bad faith
2. 2.▲
   by stale2001 12y ago

   "has no legal grounds for complaining." What is legal an what is right are two separate things. Yes, everything that the company did was legal. Everyone knows that. They still acted in bad faith, though. And this is going to c
3. 3.▲
   by stale2001 12y ago

   Obviously the employee made some mistakes, he even admits to this. Thats not the point. The point is that Unbabel acted horribly to its employee and acted in bad faith pretty much ever step along the way. People keep thinking this situati
4. 4.▲
   by stale2001 13y ago

   What world is this article living in? I got a job making $100k as a software engineer, right out of college (top-tier I guess). And then I realized that I was worth more than that, and 8 months later I'm now switching over to a job m