st00

6 ms·

1.
by st00 3y ago
I can't tell whether you're joking, wilfully misinterpreting the GP, or something else. The past few years have highlighted some of the suboptimal machinations of our society, like collusion between government and media to silence
2.
by st00 3y ago
> Lamont added that the badge data viewed by company leaders is aggregate data and not individualized. Most Googlers are not consciously aware how accessible this information is; go/creepy from your Corp machine. > The crackdown
3.
by st00 3y ago
Since you opened with passive-aggressive hints of racism, it's possible that you're not following the thread, or actually reading the replies. Please draw your attention to the discussion about the witness in the process of image
4.
by st00 3y ago
I lead a team of physicists and software engineers that develop games whose core mechanics are natively quantum. You can see our work: - https://quantumchess.net (has run on Google's quantum computer) - https:/&#x2F
5.
by st00 3y ago
I like that you're thinking about the second order effects of this phrase. That said, I might be wrong, but it seems to me that your argument depends on taking the phrase at face value rather than core value. I might describe the cor
6.
by st00 3y ago
Could you say more about why you think that this is a terrible take? It's not clear to me from your comment. If you're being sarcastic: forgive me; bravo, well-played. Otherwise... My attempt at a generous reading would summarize
7.
by st00 4y ago
Would Glitch be a modern equivalent? https://glitch.com/
8.
by st00 4y ago
It appears that you've taken an ideological stance, and interpreted all of human activity through the lens of your ideology. Hamlet et al are about a lot of things, but most of all, they're about the vast richness of human experi
9.
by st00 4y ago
Come help us build a quantum physics game engine: https://github.com/quantumlib/unitary
10.
by st00 4y ago
It seems as though you've conflated the management of perception with the practice of ethical research. Google is very rich and that enables them to control resources and build things that make them richer. They're in positive fee
11.
by st00 4y ago
I'm curious about why you would want (or, expect) an institution to resolve a cultural or interpersonal phenomenon. Maybe I've misunderstood your meaning or intent. It strikes me that this is a behavior, and if it's common, t
12.
by st00 4y ago
I read the OP slightly differently. I think there's an expectation that science is about a pure-ish pursuit of knowledge. In that context, careerism works against the philosophy and goals of the effort. In growing commerce/industr
13.
by st00 4y ago
Google has some classes on this, developed by their Tech Writers: https://developers.google.com/tech-writing Originally, the material was targeted at SWEs, trying to give them pragmatic ways of thinking about the advice you
14.
NTI statement on “Monkeypox” tabletop exercise(nti.org)
5 points by st00 4y ago|0 comments
15.
by st00 5y ago
Don't be daft. The vaccine mandate proposes a false choice: take the vaccine and carry on, or don't take the vaccine and lose your income, tenure, and status. In effect you become marginalized on the basis of a choice about your
16.
by st00 5y ago
I remember when the ethos at Google was to compete on technical excellence. Yes, those days are long gone. Yes, technical excellence isn't enough to "win" the IM market (assuming that winning is possible or even desirable).
17.
by st00 5y ago
Could you expand your thoughts a bit? Scott writes... “5 minutes refers to the time needed to calculate a single amplitude (or perhaps, several correlated amplitudes) using tensor network contraction. It doesn’t refer to the time needed to
18.
by st00 5y ago
Thanks for the feedback! We intended for each clip to be much shorter, which might have diminished the importance of a feature like the one you suggested. Even after we cut down the audio we got from the team, there was still a lot of grea