sspies

5 ms·

1.
by sspies 1y ago
Thank you for creating dataclasses!
2.
Four Projects, 45 Days, AI-Augmented Coding(launch5k.com)
1 points by sspies 2y ago|0 comments
3.
by sspies 4y ago
Hey there. Please go ahead creating an account using the form just below the hero. You should be able to provision a router right away.
4.
Nextpacket: Bare-Metal Routers for the Network Edge(nextpacket.net)
6 points by sspies 4y ago|4 comments
5.
by sspies 6y ago
I have been running my own postgres helm chart with read replication and pgpool2 for three years and never had major trouble. If you're interested check out https://github.com/sspies8684/helm-repo
6.
by sspies 10y ago
Actually, each tenant has just a view of the full table. There is no need to save the same routes for each customer over and over again. Furthermore, there is aggregation done before a route is installed on the switch.
7.
by sspies 11y ago
I can fully agree with your experience using DNS failover vs anycast failover. Made a video of how I implemented anycast https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tsXpQHi7Udo
8.
by sspies 11y ago
We are working on this as well at http://datapath.io . You can use multiple iaas providers using global elastic IP addresses that you can announce from multiple locations at the same time. If you want to participate in our beta p
9.
Looking for datapath.io beta users
9 points by sspies 11y ago|1 comments
10.
by sspies 11y ago
I do not like fat jars. We use JVM + mvn + appassembler and pack the output into docker images. Not a big deal.
11.
by sspies 11y ago
+1 for Unix Network Programming. http://www.amazon.com/UNIX-Network-Programming-Richard-Steve...
12.
by sspies 12y ago
Transit providers sell access to the whole internet to us. We are in negotitations with them, but we will be more specific, once we have the commitments. Technically, we choose at least three different providers, so our appliance has a good
13.
by sspies 12y ago
Traffic passes the appliance at the edge of the hosting provider. It takes congestion at all links and the appliance itself into account and re-routes accordingly. Depending on the characteristics of the location, at least three very unsimi
14.
by sspies 12y ago
We have seen providers set the TTL value to 300 seconds no matter what. Chrome has been caching names forever while running...just two examples
15.
by sspies 12y ago
You cannot do graceful failovers with Route 53. This is, because DNS is a system of many dependend caching layers and the TTL value is not realiable.
16.
by sspies 12y ago
Id adds one hop (our appliance) to the path. It tries to increase performance of your path by taking non-standard BGP metrics into account: congestion and latency
17.
by sspies 12y ago
Nope
18.
Datapath.io: Provider-Independent Elastic IP Addresses(datapath.io)
45 points by sspies 12y ago|22 comments
19.
by sspies 12y ago
Do you run multi-region or maybe multi-provider setups? How do you migrate your instances from failed regions to healthy ones? How do you route users to the healthy regions? DNS? Do you think anycast could be an alternative?
20.
by sspies 12y ago
Working on http://datapath.io , which is an SDN solution for WANs. We open the internet routing system to DevOps and provide anycast routing to cloud users and remote transit provider bypass.
21.
by sspies 12y ago
Could it be a business case to open up the routing system to users?
22.
Dataformat is a Java annotation-based binary format to POJO converter(github.com)
1 points by sspies 12y ago|0 comments
23.
by sspies 12y ago
Mainz, Germany - vastly.de Currently, SDN use cases only affect the networks within datacenters or campuses. With vast.ly, we address the WAN, one of the last IT areas that exists out of reach for most developers. We think that developers d