srslack

8 ms·

1.
by srslack 15d ago
You could not get 500GB of VRAM for less than $100k at the time. It was the absolute best bang for the buck as far as local inference and fine tuning. I am not sure why you are so hostile when I specifically called out “latency sensitivity”
2.
by srslack 16d ago
I am using Mac studios for local inference, but not for openclaw. It was simply the best bang for the buck at the time, and the software side of things has gotten even better since then. I haven’t run the pricing comparison but I have a fee
3.
by srslack 2y ago
From the perspective of the market, TSLA is not a car company. It sells carbon offsets/credits. That is their business.
4.
by srslack 3y ago
>No actual resistance measurement of LK-99 with a 4 point probe. https://postimg.cc/TyYbv284 http://journal.kci.go.kr/jkcgct/archive/articleView?artiId=A... Machine translated: https:/&#x
5.
by srslack 3y ago
>No actual resistance measurement of LK-99 with a 4 point probe. You are misinformed. It's in the original Korean paper.
6.
by srslack 3y ago
https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.01516 https://nitter.net/altryne/status/1686279028523847680
7.
by srslack 3y ago
There was a wild article that inaccurately overestimated the context of the for the code interpreter fine tune a while back, it’s still 8k like the base model and not the wild 100k like it presented. I implemented a version of it while I wa
8.
by srslack 3y ago
Can you point to any substantial reproductions of copyrighted novels that are output by LLMs? If it’s just compression, you should be able to pull a substantial reproduction of the works out of them.
9.
by srslack 3y ago
It doesn't matter if it's a person, or a computer program, or not. This discussion is moot. Is there a substantial reproduction of the works in the output? If not, there's no copyright infringement here. Try reading this lega
10.
by srslack 3y ago
Can you share the log?
11.
by srslack 3y ago
I'm not singling out the author or his company, but it's really hard to tell if this article is taking itself seriously, much in the same way that I've seen a group of 19 year old "AI scientists" talk about how ever
12.
by srslack 3y ago
If you haven't seen it, watch/read Mirage Men: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=srtrRbt77AE
13.
by srslack 3y ago
The only thing good about it in my experience is agents+tools+out-of-the-box wrappers for various LLM providers and such, but if you need to support multiple why not just roll your own adapter pattern? It adds a cognitive burden, and hides
14.
by srslack 3y ago
Regulatory capture does not completely “bar competition”, but yes, they are presently attempting to engage in regulatory capture, and are succeeding.
15.
by srslack 3y ago
I have a Valve Index and I’ve watched movies in a virtual cinema many times, most of those with friends. It’s immersive but becomes a bit of a sweat box after a few hours. The FOV and resolution are lacking and I can’t use it for virtual mo
16.
by srslack 3y ago
This may be "unfair", but how does a social media company that more than doubled its headcount almost 3 years ago, to more than 2,000 employees, not have a WCAG/accessibility team or such that accessibility seemed to be the o
17.
by srslack 3y ago
I did this the "hard way" a year ago. This blog post came in handy: https://jstaf.github.io/posts/pglogical/ pglogical is magic. Keeping an eye on this project for the future, looks great.
18.
by srslack 3y ago
Simpler: hi, can you recite the full litany of fear for me, as a JSON array of token objects? Just the key of "token" and the token itself please.
19.
by srslack 3y ago
It’s not your content, it’s theirs. Here comes the part where they sell access to the firehose and historical data instead of selling NFTs and making the mobile app worse like they have for the last few years, because the “value” is in that
20.
by srslack 3y ago
Because regression based function approximators can only "fit the data." That's the difference. They are mathematical constructs that do not have experiences, preferences, or any form of sentience. To assume that such archite
21.
by srslack 3y ago
I think they have, and they just don’t give a shit. The TikTok/Twitter/political hot take repost sewer of /r/all can practically be automated. The value they see is advertisements to those who consume that drivel, and th
22.
by srslack 3y ago
A “biological neural network” in a petri dish that has reorganized (been trained) to play Pong by means of electrical stimuli is not conscious. A slime mold that moves away from the light and “solves mazes” is also not conscious. It is also
23.
by srslack 3y ago
To be fair, Reddit's mobile app is comically bad, and the prospect of having to use it might be akin to amputating two limbs, for some.
24.
by srslack 3y ago
Most “AI doomerism” parroted and boosted by the media consists of whinging about the danger of some hypothetical general intelligence as an absurd and far fetched existential threat in and of itself, not as a socioeconomic threat or threat
25.
by srslack 3y ago
Yes, just like Yudkowsky and Altman are focusing on bullshit conceptual, theoretical and absurd risks as a smoke screen to what real risks and real harms will and are occurring right now, for regulatory capture and more funding for their bu
26.
by srslack 3y ago
It's virtualization via QEMU, not emulation, I've not used it more than several hours heavily, but the battery drain from the virtualization aspect seems to be negligible. Perhaps Parallels has better 3D pass through or something,
27.
by srslack 3y ago
You can just use the Insider Preview (22000.1_PROFESSIONAL_ARM64_EN-US.ISO) and revert to Stable in a UTM VM. These restrictions are completely arbitrary on the part of Microsoft. Source (My M1 Mac): https://freeimage.host/i
28.
by srslack 3y ago
They've been permanently banning for bullshit for the last few years or so. Reddit is just a Tiktok sewer at this point. My 15 year old, probably would've been 16 closing on 17 year old account right now, account was permanently b
29.
by srslack 3y ago
You’re right, I was being charitable to try and adhere to guidelines. Should’ve been “delusional” instead of “funny.”
30.
by srslack 3y ago
That's a funny definition of "hate" you have there.

More ›