srdjanr

5 ms·

1.
by srdjanr 3d ago
I like the pragmatic approach to backwards compatibility (accepting relatively rare breakage that's not too hard to fix) instead of requiring 100% compatibility without exceptions
2.
by srdjanr 4d ago
I agree if you one-shot something, but that hasn't been my experience at all (unless the initial prompt is so detailed that creating it took considerable time). For me it's more like being a chef but having a cook to cut up things
3.
by srdjanr 4d ago
I think it captures it perfectly, and the question is what are tomatoes here. Is it being challenged intellectually and proud of solving a puzzle, or is it getting praised, valued or paid? People didn't stop solving sudokus when sudoku
4.
by srdjanr 4d ago
That's mentioned in the article: > Further, there’s at least the possibility on the part of the developer to claim that such usage is a “parody,” with parody and satire protected at the highest levels of American law through the app
5.
by srdjanr 4d ago
It sounds like they mostly did something like that: > The lawyers then tell the developer, “You can of course easily make a video game set in a furniture store that does not look like, or suggest, an IKEA store.” The presumed game develo
6.
by srdjanr 4d ago
My (very) naive take: Was it important part of the game that the store looks just like IKEA? If yes, that probably makes it more likely that it was a trademark infringement and that IKEA was justified. If no, it shouldn't be a big dea
7.
by srdjanr 10d ago
I don't remember seeing playstation controller SVGs before, I doubt they benchmaxxed that
8.
by srdjanr 24d ago
Would you be able to get those devices at all, especially at similar price as those with closed source firmware? R
9.
by srdjanr 1mo ago
Apparently it forces your feed to show posts in chronological order, not how algorithm decides
10.
by srdjanr 2mo ago
Only if non-ASCII characters are allowed in usernames, and generally I don't think they often are
11.
by srdjanr 2mo ago
Sure, we should kill everyone who makes an honest, human mistake. Especially if it's so hard to catch that at least 3 people missed it (someone from the police, prosecutor, and defense lawyer).
12.
by srdjanr 2mo ago
> and you can't use those logs for other purposes like ad targeting This part I guess
13.
by srdjanr 2mo ago
I wouldn't expect their detection of hacked accounts to be 100% correct. Sure, it might be obvious when a human takes a look, but humans can't proactively look at every account's usage.
14.
by srdjanr 2mo ago
I think it depends on how much time you spend learning something and "engaging" with LLM. I have many times asked it something I was slightly curious about, got the answer after the first or 2nd-3rd prompt, spent 3 minutes in tota
15.
by srdjanr 2mo ago
I also have one anecdote - I (think) I understood basics of quantum mechanics intuitively for the first time. Of course it's probably superficial and maybe not 100% correct, but it is better than every time I tried to understand it bef
16.
by srdjanr 2mo ago
It's a very lagging metric, and also influenced by sales, market conditions for your customers etc.
17.
by srdjanr 2mo ago
Good question, I guess you can run two identical Postgress instances and check if they have a diff
18.
by srdjanr 2mo ago
They should call themselves Time Lords
19.
by srdjanr 2mo ago
I have a few opinions on this: 1) My (and possibly other people's) last impression of this was when it was merged just based on all tests passing. In many projects, relying just on tests would definitely be reckless (not sure about cov
20.
by srdjanr 2mo ago
Of course he has the right to do it, no one disputes that. The users and community also have the right to complain, or stop using and supporting Bun because they don't like his actions
21.
by srdjanr 3mo ago
Tutorial was great! And I would like the option to give up.
22.
by srdjanr 3mo ago
They could be using this just to throw out the obviously bad CVs, and then manually go over the rest. I'm not sure if they do this in practice, but the tech itself can be useful. Also if HR was really useless (or actively hurting the c
23.
by srdjanr 3mo ago
That's a good idea. The only drawback I see is that you should compare every pair of CVs for best results, and that grows quadraticly with number of CVs. Of course you can settle for fewer comparisons and not perfect results. But then
24.
by srdjanr 3mo ago
It makes sense to me intuitively (though I'm not sure if my reasoning is actually correct). Worse model may not "know" enough to distinguish between a 70 and a 100 candidate, so it's expected that it's output has hi
25.
by srdjanr 3mo ago
Of course, nothing can guarantee the right answer from LLMs
26.
by srdjanr 3mo ago
At the end they mentioned they're exploring global trust signals
27.
by srdjanr 3mo ago
So this is only one of the reasons, and a relatively small one: “Our estimate is that about 200 to 400 pedestrians a year would not have died if vehicles had remained approximately the same size over the past quarter-century,” the report co
28.
by srdjanr 3mo ago
Of course there is. If it increased from 1MB to 4MB, that would definitely be insignificant
29.
by srdjanr 3mo ago
How can they even do that without storing plaintext passwords?
30.
by srdjanr 3mo ago
Security researcher is a common term, there's also market research which doesn't look like it falls under your definition

More ›