spurdoman77

14 ms·

1.
by spurdoman77 5y ago
Cpu registers are cache for...
2.
by spurdoman77 5y ago
For stablecoins, I think normal people dont think thar much about the shadiness but more if it works or not. Tether has been keeping their stablecoin stable for 6+ years, for normal users it looks good for quite wide variery of uses. Of cou
3.
by spurdoman77 5y ago
Probably all wealthy countries are big destinations for dirty money. Wouldnt make sense to bring dirty money to poor country because there it would attract more attention.
4.
by spurdoman77 5y ago
I can't wait until Bitcoin makes this kind of things easier. Carrying cash in plastic bags sounds such a boomer thing to do.
5.
by spurdoman77 5y ago
Just use stablecoins bro
6.
by spurdoman77 5y ago
> The fact that Coinbase did a DPO instead of some kind of fancy DeFi-based offering is telling in their potential lack of conviction in the ability to offer public securities at this stage in the game through some of these smart contrac
7.
by spurdoman77 5y ago
Makes sense. All work and no play makes Jack a very dull boy.
8.
by spurdoman77 5y ago
The bitcoin blockchain is full of transactions, and lots are probably being made offchain on Lightning Network or on centralized services. Your claim is that all these transactions are for speculation only (which is quite common claim). On
9.
by spurdoman77 5y ago
Coinbase is custodying 760k BTC or so... thats more than 5% of all BTC in existence.
10.
by spurdoman77 5y ago
Thats cheap transaction fee for buying my yacht or private island with BTC
11.
by spurdoman77 5y ago
If tumblers are a problem, why wouldnt monero be? You could view it just as a BTC that has built-in tumbler. I dont really follow this logic of Monero shills. Exchanges can ban both tumblers AND monero.
12.
by spurdoman77 5y ago
The exchange taking it wont be knowingly taking it, it is likely just a exchange that doesnt have system for detecting it. There are thousands of btc exchanges all around the world. For sure there are some where they dont even know about bi
13.
by spurdoman77 5y ago
Depends on the kind of transaction you are doing. For bigger transactions it is actually nice not having to pay percentual fee as with Bitcoin. However with coinbase I believe they are high percentually.
14.
by spurdoman77 5y ago
That is quite literally illegal nowadays in many jurisdictions.
15.
by spurdoman77 5y ago
Not very valuable opinion if you dont have any arguments.
16.
by spurdoman77 5y ago
https://coingeek.com/binance-not-licensed-to-operate-in-malt... Binance has never been in Malta, in fact they are not located anywhere. I would be very cautious in dealing with them because to me that kind of approach to re
17.
by spurdoman77 5y ago
No, not at all. Basically, if you dont want to deal with the onchain transactions, you could sell the risk of that to someone else and only deal in internal offchain transactions. Dont know if this actually happens though.
18.
by spurdoman77 5y ago
Even in the ancient Silk Road you could sell contraband effectively using internal, offchain transactions only. The customers pay using offchain transactions using the market, and the vendor can cash out via some trader in the same market.
19.
by spurdoman77 5y ago
The boards try to maximize ownership value, and I think they genuinely believe thar if they give CEO the stock options that is also making the stock price to go up on average.
20.
by spurdoman77 5y ago
Cash is perfect for small criminals. Practically useless for bigger criminals.
21.
by spurdoman77 5y ago
Central bankers are often pro-cash but anti-bitcoin. They dont want competition.
22.
by spurdoman77 5y ago
Trust issues. While 80% of employees could be more productive remote, 18% could have serious issues with productivity and 2% might actually turn nefarious while remote (steal company IPR or something like that). Or I would imagine thats wha
23.
by spurdoman77 5y ago
NFTs are pretty useful for money laundering.
24.
by spurdoman77 5y ago
Its not really that hard. Just mix the coins somehow after purchase.
25.
by spurdoman77 5y ago
The source-of-funds problem is solvable, otherwise companies like coinbase wouldnt be allowed to exist. Paypal just needs to buy some chain analysis service, and implement SARs and other related AML stuff.
26.
by spurdoman77 6y ago
You get what you negotiate for, not what you deserve.
27.
by spurdoman77 6y ago
This. People underestimate the value reputation like this can have in the industry. And anyway, the guy is smart, he just has to work on his monetization strategy. The business model where you do things for free in hopes that some kind corp
28.
by spurdoman77 6y ago
Though, there isnt guarantee that someone will keep hosting these? Similarly as with torrents the seeders might go away. Maybe marginally better than URL but not very much IMO.
29.
by spurdoman77 6y ago
Proof of stake literally makes rich richer, thats the point of it - holders can mint new blocks. With proof of work there is actual work involved tol, not just minting money with your capital.
30.
by spurdoman77 6y ago
He paid and there was dinner, it was just delayed. Shitcoins are good business, Justin can afford stupid shit.

More ›