Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
spinlocked
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
5 ms
·
1.
▲
by
spinlocked
13y ago
what does your job ad wording look like?
2.
▲
Distributed ban evading crawler that runs on ec2
1 points
by
spinlocked
14y ago
|
1 comments
3.
▲
by
spinlocked
14y ago
Stanford Vs MIT When MIT makes education widely available you get "open courseware" notes and unstructured videos. When Stanford makes education widely available you get coursra and udacity. When MIT is presented with Aaron Swartz you get u
4.
▲
by
spinlocked
14y ago
true. however, libstdc++ implements __pool_alloc for a reason.
5.
▲
by
spinlocked
14y ago
Do you need magic to create an O(1) allocator for a pool of fixed size objects?
6.
▲
by
spinlocked
14y ago
This result should not surprise any experienced programmers, but unfortunately it does many of us. 1. for that workload the result should not really surprise anyone. 2. you are pointing to one pathological workload to make a point that ve
7.
▲
by
spinlocked
14y ago
Did you create a new account solely to bash this guy?
8.
▲
by
spinlocked
14y ago
see my post below your second highest voted comment on this thread.
9.
▲
by
spinlocked
14y ago
i disagree.
10.
▲
by
spinlocked
14y ago
Not at all. Thanks for posting OP. Any technical discussion is welcome here. Ignore the haters who think STL vectors are a drop in replacement for lists.
11.
▲
by
spinlocked
14y ago
"insertions to the end of a variable-length array are very fast" really tptacek? its O(1) ammortized over time, and when N grows it becomes really slow because it involves reallocation and a linear copy of all elements.
12.
▲
by
spinlocked
14y ago
My 3 year old niece is far more articulate than you. I'm serious, you're an embarrassment to this board.
13.
▲
by
spinlocked
14y ago
It would be lovely if HN could be a place where people could rise above their petty self interests and help the community move forward. Thomas is at the wrong end of this spectrum. TheAmazingIdiot is correct BTW. Its hard to imagine Thomas
14.
▲
by
spinlocked
14y ago
tptacek, give up already, i think everyone here is in agreement that your views are perverted.
15.
▲
by
spinlocked
14y ago
Your views are consistent with a paid or otherwise incentivized "shill" with vested interests in taking the opposite view of any positive legislative action regarding the Swartz case. You knocked the earlier legislative proposal, now you ar
16.
▲
by
spinlocked
14y ago
Lets just sit back and revel in the irony of programmers discussing broad fixes to federal laws, based on insights from reddit comments. To all the armchair legal experts of HN, here's a challenge: draft legislation that fixes what you prop
17.
▲
by
spinlocked
14y ago
If you could kindly edit your top comment by requesting readers to contact their representatives to help get this passed, THEN i will move on. Till then I have a pretty low opinion of you.
18.
▲
by
spinlocked
14y ago
YES. Vote up this comment, for he speaks the truth. Edit: Note to PG and HN mods. With power comes responsibility. You have in the past allowed cynical posts from reaching the top and influencing opinion and thats led to tragic consequences
19.
▲
by
spinlocked
14y ago
Its too late for that. Look to the future instead. Will having Arron's Law in place, coupled with civil outcry and petitions we've seen , prevent the next Aaron from being over-zealously prosecuted? I think the answer is: not entirely, but
20.
▲
by
spinlocked
14y ago
Lofgren's proposal appears to address the EFFs main concerns: https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2013/01/aaron-swartz-fix-draco... Legislating against what you term "prosecutorial misconduct" is far fetched. Can you imagine how you would word
21.
▲
by
spinlocked
14y ago
Can people in say, Saudi Arabia, sign up and petition?
22.
▲
by
spinlocked
14y ago
Well said.
23.
▲
by
spinlocked
14y ago
You look within. We all need to "man up". Hackers vs. Wankers.
24.
▲
by
spinlocked
14y ago
I believe he was referring to the top voted post from 4 months ago. We, as a community, did not come around for one of us, instead some of you bashed the guy when he was down, now he's dead. Shame. Edit: ameliorated ending
25.
▲
by
spinlocked
14y ago
You could perhaps see the consistency also between rallying round a cause and making a difference to the status quo. These "opinions" are shared by his family, read the statement. _You_ are problematic.
26.
▲
by
spinlocked
14y ago
We are all partially responsible in a small way. We did not take a stand when that link was posted. Each one of us who did not donate or pass that link around. Maybe we were swayed by the comments, maybe not. Call ourselves hackers, get inf
27.
▲
Java 7 runtime zero-day exploits in wild
(reviews.cnet.com)
2 points
by
spinlocked
14y ago
|
0 comments
28.
▲
by
spinlocked
14y ago
Great stuff. This is big, if you can pull it off.
29.
▲
by
spinlocked
16y ago
That brought back a memory. Only instead of a wobbly RAM pack I had a tape recorder. This was about 15-20 years ago.
30.
▲
Reverse engineering the firmware on the im-me. (fravia would be pleased)
(daveshacks.blogspot.com)
2 points
by
spinlocked
16y ago
|
0 comments
More ›