spgorbatiuk

8 ms·

1.
by spgorbatiuk 2mo ago
I personally like the idea of separating the code and the "essential complexity". People can and probably should collaborate heavily on the latter, while the former gets better and better solved by the agents. FYI, I know of folks
2.
by spgorbatiuk 2mo ago
There's clearly room for improvement there, you're right, but I'd also say these kinds of tasks are severely underconstrained, and if you have a certain image of how it should look in mind, you should give it a lot of referen
3.
by spgorbatiuk 2mo ago
In short, so to not repeat the others' advice -- yeah, go find communities where those people you think will find this useful hang out. Contributing will not only spread the word, but also help you refine some of your assumptions for s
4.
by spgorbatiuk 3mo ago
The value was never really in the building, it was just hidden by how expensive building used to be. When making the thing was the hard part, you could mistake "I built it" for "I have a business." Now that the build is
5.
by spgorbatiuk 3mo ago
Frankly, coding with Claude Code and having Copilot read through the PR is complementary and helps to catch some things that slipped through
6.
by spgorbatiuk 3mo ago
It would help if you could provide a bit more details on what you're building and in which domain. But from what you provided, I would make sure you really get to the bottom of why this pilot happened with your customer: did they have
7.
by spgorbatiuk 3mo ago
Yeah, my assumed neurodivergence has never been more apparent to me than in these moments. Sometimes it feels like genuinely more stuff is getting done in parallel, but I haven't figured out the key to this kind of performance. So, at
8.
by spgorbatiuk 3mo ago
I don't know if it's just my perception, but I think the "channels" feature is massively underestimated. I get that it's basically their response to openclaw, and people kind of had enough of that stuff, but having
9.
by spgorbatiuk 3mo ago
We're a startup, and every role uses AI for many tasks, at times quite efficiently. There's no organised strategy rn, just the generous limits incentivising the use. The only organised effort, I'd say, is on the engineering s
10.
by spgorbatiuk 3mo ago
Hardware and provider juggling is a way to go, although I think it is also worth mentioning that the cost is not only the price-per-token, but first of all, the amount of tokens used. Depending on what one builds, comprehensive documentatio
11.
by spgorbatiuk 3mo ago
In an unlikely scenario you haven't stumbled upon the superpowers ( https://claude.com/plugins/superpowers ), I really recommend the /brainstorming skill there. The plugin itself leans into engineering domain,
12.
by spgorbatiuk 3mo ago
Sad, but fair!
13.
by spgorbatiuk 3mo ago
Not sure if I got the question right, but there are benchmarks like SWE pro and stuff. There's whole another debate whether you can trust it or not, and whether the labs are training on those benchmarks, but that's one way to meas
14.
by spgorbatiuk 3mo ago
Now, that development and prototyping is way cheaper than before, how would you say an approach to ideas validation change? Which types of hypotheses are better and faster tested using via vibe-coding, and which should still be verified lik
15.
by spgorbatiuk 3mo ago
Both CC (mostly pet projects and automation), and Cursor (mostly at work, because I still read the code, interact with python notebooks, etc.)