spacechild1

7 ms·

1.
by spacechild1 6d ago
That was obviously a joke...
2.
by spacechild1 11d ago
You have claimed that "last year exactly zero developers used this convention." If you choose to use hyperbole, don't be surprised when people push back. > I don't think I have a single "feature/*" bran
3.
by spacechild1 16d ago
> Like using feature/xxxxx as the branch name. Last year exactly zero developers used this convention. People have been doing this for years.
4.
by spacechild1 18d ago
No, just no.
5.
by spacechild1 18d ago
Yes, that's the correct definition.
6.
by spacechild1 20d ago
I recently saw "Exit 8" and I found it pretty intriguing. However, it's free adaptation of an experimental indie game. Funnily enough, I didn't even know that the movie was based on game. I was very surprised when I foun
7.
by spacechild1 20d ago
I saw one Pokemon movie and even as a child I found it lazy and disappointing. That's quite a feat...
8.
by spacechild1 21d ago
OP is right. There are too many people here in the comments who act surprised although it has been very clear what the Trump administration is trying to do. The cruelty is the point and they are not even trying to hide it.
9.
by spacechild1 21d ago
I just use Obsidian as a glorified notebook. I've been using paper notebooks, but I tend to lose them... With Obsidian I just push my files to git and never worry again. Since the files are just markdown, there's no lock-in. What
10.
by spacechild1 21d ago
Just go ahead and quit! I had a niche use case for FB, but I decided to quit nevertheless because I didn't want to support the platform anymore. Today I don't miss it a single bit. (I never had a Twitter account in the first place
11.
by spacechild1 21d ago
Yes! Personally, I love writing software, but I would never want to do it at a company.
12.
by spacechild1 21d ago
Nor artisanal web design.
13.
by spacechild1 23d ago
> even if they try hard to avoid it. The thing is: a16z isn't even trying to avoid it, they are intentionally looking for questionable startups and cultivate a controversial reputation. They seem to have no moral filter whatsoever.
14.
by spacechild1 23d ago
I guess that's were you end up when you aim for "zero introspection". Marc Andreessen proves again and again that he's an utter piece of shit.
15.
by spacechild1 26d ago
Yes, and it's infuriating! Do they really think readers won't notice?
16.
by spacechild1 28d ago
C11 made VLA optional again. C++ never standardized it in the first place.
17.
by spacechild1 1mo ago
So what does it mean to ship from Asia to Bangladesh? Do you ship from India, Iran or Indonesia? Or just within Bangladesh? :)
18.
by spacechild1 1mo ago
> from Asia to Nigeria/Bangladesh. Bangladesh is a country in Asia...
19.
by spacechild1 1mo ago
How can you assess the output of coding agents if you don't know about algorithms and other fundamentals of software engineering?
20.
by spacechild1 1mo ago
Fortunately, I haven't jumped the bandwagon yet, so I don't even have to think about going back :)
21.
by spacechild1 1mo ago
Exactly. For example, you can be the leader of an open source project.
22.
by spacechild1 1mo ago
Engines like Unity or Godot are also well suited for 2D games and don't have the problem you have described. Also, there are quite a few game genres between visual novels and AAA 3D games. You are right that you can often ditch the eng
23.
by spacechild1 1mo ago
Thanks for sharing! Great attitude!
24.
by spacechild1 1mo ago
Thank you! That's exactly what I was about to write.
25.
by spacechild1 1mo ago
Yes, it's probably just you.
26.
by spacechild1 1mo ago
> In postMessage mode the client and the engine run in separate execution contexts with no shared memory, exchanging serialised OSC - the browser enforces that boundary the same way the kernel does between processes on a socket. You won&
27.
by spacechild1 1mo ago
That's a very striking - and depressing - comparison.
28.
by spacechild1 1mo ago
> if the shape of the architectural boundary is the same as the networked OSC case then I think it’s very reasonable to argue that its aggregation and not derivative. Where do you got that? The GPLv3 license text only says: > A compil
29.
by spacechild1 1mo ago
I don't think that the SuperCollider team has an official stance on this and I can't really speak for all developers. Legally, I think you're on the safe side as long as scsynth runs in a separate process (which is the case f
30.
by spacechild1 1mo ago
Thanks for the kind response! > I’m also definitely not wanting to circumnavigate the GPL! You are going to great lengths to make sure that SuperSonic (and thus scsynth) can be used by non-GPL code. You are explicitly advertising in the

More ›