soniclettuce

5 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by soniclettuce 2mo ago

   I think they're saying that their understanding of the hypothetical error is that somebody more or less configured a price as 5¢/byte instead of 5¢/GB. And if that's the case, that's not really a thing testing will
2. 2.▲
   by soniclettuce 6mo ago

   I can't say ADRs work that great, in my experience, but the flaw was more connecting them to other architectural stuff to make them actually discoverable and drawing the boundaries in a logical way (what goes into an ADR and what goes
3. 3.▲
   by soniclettuce 9mo ago

   Is he writing assembly for his syscalls too, or is it like, "no stdlib, except for real annoying parts"
4. 4.▲
   by soniclettuce 10mo ago

   Location: Alberta, Canada Remote: Yes (open to in-person also) Willing to relocate: Yes (for US companies, I'm a licensed P.Eng so I should be eligible for a TN visa under USMCA/NAFTA - I understand there's much less overhead
5. 5.▲
   by soniclettuce 10mo ago

   They were not uploading files. They were crawling the site with URLs that in turn made the search engine retrieve the CSAM and display it. Still shitty, but more obviously a technical mistake than a deliberate ploy.
6. 6.▲
   by soniclettuce 2y ago

   I'm not them but I suspect they mean a kind of "above my paygrade/not my problem" tendency. You can defer almost indefinitely (or make other people do it for you) a lot complicated work with phrases like "we need se
7. 7.▲
   by soniclettuce 11y ago

   I feel like you hit a borderline-pathological case for the noise reducer with that image. It hasn't just blurred the cross-hatching (? is that what those patterned lines are called?), its completely removed it. I tried it with just ups