Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
somesay
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
5 ms
·
1.
▲
by
somesay
10y ago
Facebook Messenger is the thing where everything is minded and you'll get all the AI bots etc. WhatsApp instead is their chat app for users how don't like Facebook. WhatsApp has way more users than Facebook Messengers. And now the
2.
▲
by
somesay
10y ago
Once your number had e2e support0, you can't switch to a phone without e2e. Notifications on key changes are switched off by default, but I hope they still warn you in the chat history. We'll see.
3.
▲
by
somesay
10y ago
You could backup the key like every other account password, too. Save it in your password manager, print it. Whatever. This isn't really an argument. When Android backups Wifi passwords, those are encrypted with your Google password th
4.
▲
by
somesay
11y ago
No. Actually, I would say fake encryption is even dangerous. WhatsApp might not always run end-to-end encryption for compatibility issues, there isn't even a visual indication for encrypted connections, there is no way to verify keys (
5.
▲
by
somesay
11y ago
In my case using SMS for 2FA only works within their new interface. Whenever an online shop is redirecting to PayPal, it's the old login page (and doesn't notice when already logged in on PayPal), so I basically never receive 2FA
6.
▲
by
somesay
11y ago
Also keep in mind they tested all extensions with their default filter lists configuration while it reads like EasyList and EasyPrivacy would be efficient enough. As applying filter rules is basically the main work of those extensions and m
7.
▲
by
somesay
11y ago
While it's also about liability, there seem to be people deadly allergic to even small amounts of e.g. nuts. Those notices are shown when production machines are also shared used for other products and cleaning is never completely safe
8.
▲
by
somesay
11y ago
I like the integrated window control buttons and it has a nicer name than this project. Besides from that both are good wrappers for web.whatsapp.com and have native notifications, notification counter etc.
9.
▲
by
somesay
11y ago
I wonder why you're excluding StartSSL. It's no matter if you trust them as long as all major OS/browsers trust them.
10.
▲
by
somesay
12y ago
> Also, since Google Code hosting project is closing down, you can expect more projects being driven to it. Well, Google Code was never used for private repositories, so that argument is irrelevant for the intended free private repositor
11.
▲
by
somesay
12y ago
Having ads means you're acting commercially which is a very bad idea if you already in a semi-legal area. Besides from that it's far away from their initially spread ideology to make a lot of money or show porn ads. I mean TPB use
12.
▲
by
somesay
12y ago
While the effort is remarkable, the web isn't fixed and this isn't responsive. Just wondering what happens if someone hasn't that font installed or the browser rendering is still different and everything is off then. At least
13.
▲
by
somesay
12y ago
Hilarious if you see how Amazon still doesn't care about hyphenation on their Kindle platforms. It's an easy job, e.g. the algorithm used by LaTeX is free to use and with Amazon's size they might even build a good database to
14.
▲
by
somesay
12y ago
I haven't read the long article but it ends with: > UPDATE (2014-09-06): As […] was the first to point out, RFC 7217 addresses all of my issues with “privacy” addresses. Let implementation come soon! So, not backing your message.
15.
▲
by
somesay
12y ago
What a joke, I hate those biased generalized articles. > 1. Early-stage startup teams cannot afford to handle the hardware fragmentation that plagues Android. You have a full stack of iOS devices, too, maybe even more expensive. It'
16.
▲
by
somesay
12y ago
> Piping programs into each other is okay, but once you start bundling it's all up in the air. How does bundling mean combining it into an _executable_ file? Sure, this could be the case for an installer, but that one could also jus
17.
▲
by
somesay
12y ago
So why should they patch it then? Keep in mind that any attack using that bug is quite stealthy.
18.
▲
by
somesay
12y ago
Test tool: http://filippo.io/Heartbleed/ (not mine)
19.
▲
by
somesay
12y ago
What's exactly the problem? Could be fixed by either getting the latest package upgrades from you favorite distro or compile an old version yourself with a specific flag set as mentioned in the security report. Or are you behind some t
20.
▲
by
somesay
12y ago
Looks similar to FireChat ( https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/firechat/id719829352 ), using mesh network technology (according to news reports, not app description). While the chat function is maybe more of a tec
21.
▲
by
somesay
12y ago
Also you have to get to an USB port, seems like attackers know for some ATMs where to cut a hole in for that. But the real problem is that the machine isn't isolated well enough through hardware design. Just imagine you could access an
22.
▲
by
somesay
12y ago
It's definitely not vendor specific since I've seen manuals for various devices. When successfully started Android, you should be able to access it by long-pressing the power button to get into a popup menu, then long-tapping on t
23.
▲
by
somesay
12y ago
Well, current Android versions support starting the device in safe mode, not executing any third-party apps then, so that you can remove misbehaving apps. Looks like this is made exactly for such situations. Though I'm not sure if that
24.
▲
by
somesay
13y ago
Are you using SPF and DKIM? Those proof that the emails are verified by the DNS of the sender's domain. Maybe IP based blacklists are more likely ignored since providers could rather block based on domains than. Both technologies are a
25.
▲
by
somesay
13y ago
I would say, you always have to trust the service provider. While you can manually verify a direct end-to-end connection etc., web apps could always easily change, without user notice. Well, but that's also true for any proprietary app
26.
▲
by
somesay
13y ago
Well, but everyone could try guessing the names then, something they probably don't want. After all, it's just speculation what they have hidden there.
27.
▲
by
somesay
13y ago
Apples and oranges. I guess availability (publish time and original language), being able to really download, collect and share a movie, play it without problems (HDCP, Silverlight, smartphone support, ...), not having to get a credit card
28.
▲
by
somesay
13y ago
Well, differently to (mostly) pirate sites, GitHub hosts a ton of projects, how should they know that this is related to Popcorn Time? If they have any specific clue, they is quite a risk that they publish that and get real problems.
29.
▲
by
somesay
13y ago
I guess full name credits to prove their participation in case of job interviews while not making it too easy for the lawyers to address them. A timestamped, maybe later revealed proof of knowledge or secret communication doesn't make
30.
▲
by
somesay
13y ago
If they like the public to read it, they would have used a signature instead of an encryption. ;)
More ›